Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Quote Originally Posted by SlimTrae View Post
Not sure where my view is on it.
On one hand, censorship isn't good. On the other, if it is a social-media platform, then i see it as a business.
That's the crux of a lot of these arguments are they a platform or are they a publisher. If they're a platform then the thought is Free Speech applies, if they are a publisher then they're a business and can pick & choose. You see the same with Twitter & Facebook and this is the biggest issue of these companies. If you're a publisher you can be held accountable for what you publish, if you're a platform you're just allowing people a chance to express themselves.

Quote Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell View Post
Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Alex Jones should be allowed on YouTube I mean his channel is as accurate as any of the rest of the "news" channels. The Young Turks are on YouTube why? Sam Seder & The Majority Report are on YouTube why? Alex Jones is bombastic and more than a bit of a goofball, but he's harmless as far as "news" goes.
Well, well, well....
And?
When you said "Jack be nimble, Jack be quick", most of us could SWEAR you'd just done bong hits. So please forgive us for being surprised at your brand new characterizations using words like "bombastic/goofball/harmless".... is it now "Jack jumped over the candlestick", Lyle?