Pacman v Hamed

[ICB]

Hamed was already on the downside by the Kelly fight.

Hamed beat everyone he could he held every belt at 126lbs.

I think Pac would have won but by Barerra Hamed was a shadow.

How could he be on the downside when he hadn't shown any sign's of it in previous fights ?? like i said don't you think it has something to do with Naz stepping up in class that made him look bad. Remember that was Naz's first fight in the USA.

He was showing it. Remember the medina fight? Hamed seemed to run hot and cold, he would look unbeatable against johnson robinson and vulnerable against Medina and Alicea(for a second)

So there's no real way to tell when he was on the downside. But what was apparent was that he wasnt listening to Ingle in the Kelley fight.

Well i never thought Robinson was elite i know his story about winning the title on only 24 hours notice, i did watch the fight but i always thought Robinson skill wise was only goodish fighter despite the title defense he made. When i watched Robinson i never saw anything that stood out, a bit like Tom Johnson as well. And how can a fighter be on the downslide at 23 years old ?? its not like Naz was another Mike Tyson is it ?? he was physically and mentally ok, it was just down to his poor balance which made him too easy to counter when he lunged in and thats why he struggled against Kelley.