Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post

You get a response from BoxRec yet?
I have no problem with them placing PAC as #1 at 140... Why hassle myself about this...

To those who vehemently protested about this ranking, why not throw tomatoes, rotten eggs, etc. on BoxRec ...
.
So you also agree that PAC is #5 p4p behind JMM?

I have no crazy problem with that... they have their own basis and computations for that... heck, Vazquez is no. 3 P4P, JMM 4 and PAC 5... There's no point of arguing with that...

But having no problem with BoxRec rankings doesn't mean I totally agree with them completely... lol
.