Manny Pac the worst P4P #1 ever.

[eagle]

Is this the only way you know to destroy PAC's reputation?? At the expense of other boxers, by degrading other boxers and treating them all like shits?? That they won't stand a chance against top boxers in past eras... What a shame??

Well to prove me and this whole thread wrong all u have to do is name another former P4P #1 who Pac would beat P4P. Its that easy right? Do that and i'll admit to all this thread is wrong and u are smarter than me. If u cant think of anyone will u do the same. Hop to it.....

manny doesnt have to beat any of those guys to be the best pound for pound among them. that is because he is the lightest of them all. tell me, can the rest in your ex lb for lb champ list beat a prime tyson? no. that is why there are weight divisions in boxing. u just cant let a sixth grader bully up a first grader for the former surely wins. pac maybe is the lightest lb for lb king yes but surely he is not the worst. you should even give credit for the fact that pac made efforts to fight bigger opponents and still won. the best isnt really judged by size, it is by will.

Good first ALT thread. Do u even understand the concept of a P4P list? The general idea of it is that if 2 guys were the same size the better fighter P4P would win. Of course a lightweight aint gonna beat a good heavy, but thats not what its about.

If Pac and any of the listed names fought at the same weight he'd lose to all. Bhop, RJJ, PBF, Whitaker etc etc would all beat Manny if they were the same size because they are/were better fighters. The best isnt judged by will, cos if it was Gatti would have been P4P #1, or Katsidis now!
It is gauged on allround ability.

Nice way to fuck up your first thread dick.