Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
Quote Originally Posted by fropo View Post
Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post

Well to prove me and this whole thread wrong all u have to do is name another former P4P #1 who Pac would beat P4P. Its that easy right? Do that and i'll admit to all this thread is wrong and u are smarter than me. If u cant think of anyone will u do the same. Hop to it.....
manny doesnt have to beat any of those guys to be the best pound for pound among them. that is because he is the lightest of them all. tell me, can the rest in your ex lb for lb champ list beat a prime tyson? no. that is why there are weight divisions in boxing. u just cant let a sixth grader bully up a first grader for the former surely wins. pac maybe is the lightest lb for lb king yes but surely he is not the worst. you should even give credit for the fact that pac made efforts to fight bigger opponents and still won. the best isnt really judged by size, it is by will.
Good first ALT thread. Do u even understand the concept of a P4P list? The general idea of it is that if 2 guys were the same size the better fighter P4P would win. Of course a lightweight aint gonna beat a good heavy, but thats not what its about.

If Pac and any of the listed names fought at the same weight he'd lose to all. Bhop, RJJ, PBF, Whitaker etc etc would all beat Manny if they were the same size because they are/were better fighters. The best isnt judged by will, cos if it was Gatti would have been P4P #1, or Katsidis now!
It is gauged on allround ability.

Nice way to fuck up your first thread dick.
now tell tyson to come all the way down to 135 and fight manny... picture it both fighters at 135 and at their prime.. who will win? surely it wont be tyson cos his punches will be less harder due the weight loss, plus the fact that there is no defense at all.. tyson at 135 is just like a ricky hatton of today.. and come may 2 we will see what lb fo lb really is.. peace