Quote Originally Posted by knodaledge View Post
Quote Originally Posted by mnmc10 View Post
one thing i dont want to happen is if pbf demands the lions share on pac. its pretty obvious now that pac should be getting the upper hand money wise. if pbf wants it he should agree to pacs terms not his. if he still insists to get the lion share then thats an indication that pbf doesnt want to fight pac.
This is what I dont understand. Why should Pacquiao get the lions share?

In their 2 common bouts (against Oscar & Hatton) Mayweather's sales were double that of Pacquiao's. I'm not saying that Mayweather generated the buzz, because it's obvious Oscar & Hatton did more than their share. But shouldn't the fights with Pacquiao have blown away the numbers Mayweather did with the same guys? If Pacquiao brings more to the table than Mayweather, his fights with Oscar & Hatton should've crushed Mayweather's numbers. But he did only half.

The bottom line is profits and Mayweather does have more of a claim to generating more profits against their 2 recent common opponents than Pacquiao has.

We can say Pacquiao is the cash cow, but in black & white Mayweather has the proof. Mayweather's last 2 fights sold better than Pacquiao's last 2 & they were against the same 2 guys. Hard to deny facts.
look, pbf was the best back then its pacs turn now. they both fought hatton and odlh and you know that pac performed better than pbf against those guys. yes pbf pulled more buys than pac but pac was a HUGE underdog on the odlh fight people didnt wasted money thinking that it would be a one sided beating odlh way.

on the hatton fight pac has an edge but people never expected a 2nd round ko by pac. lets also not forget that we are suffering from world crisis now people doesnt pay up for boxing as much as before.

now that pbf unretired AGAIN, jmm/pbf is not selling great. while pac just came out of an outstanding ko of hatton. weighing everything who do you think deserves the lions share?