Quote Originally Posted by miron_lang View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
Yup Miron you are totally right and I can't disagree. Although shane and floyd did 3 months more testing than pac's ever done....

So Floyd is offering a testing scheme that is just as Flawed if the participants are expert roider right?


So why did Floyd refuse? I hope you can come up with a logical explanation mate

The actual testing scheme isn't flawed though, unlike a urine test which detects absolutely non of the modern days sports enhancers. Was the testing done as extensively as olympic? No. But to do that you'd actually need a time machine. As far as I know those things don't exist.

To reieterate in a nutshell, you are saying the test duration is flawed (not the actual taking and testing of blood and urine). If that is the case then you should have major major problems with pac requesting 14 day cut offs and the like.

For three months during the training camp it wasn't flawed and both athletes were clean in the run up to the fight and clean when they got in the ring. Both had no steroids or enhancers in their respective systems.

The 'scheme' floyd offered although not totally perfect in it's duration was enough to scare the shit out of the pac team. If floyd's scheme was so flawed surely pac's team wouldn't have been so fazed by it.


What exactly did floyd refuse? If you are refering to the actual fight. I'll answer with another question. Would manny go into a fight without freddie roach in his corner? Uncle roger was looking at jail time around the proposed date of the fight/training camp. Floyd would have had too many distractions.

And finally. USADA take their job very very seriously. If they had thought that the proposed testing wasn't strict enough/didn't meat their criteria they wouldn't have agreed to do it. What with the international interest and the coverage of the 24/7 programme, if their testing had been 'flawed' it would have been exposed for the whole world to see.

hope that helps.