Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Chad lets give this guy Hopkins a rematch you have the ability to kick his ass
    Then you can go for Pascal

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1386
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    This fight should and will be ruled a no contest. It reminds of the Nate Campbell/Tim Bradley fight a little while back that was called a win by Bradley but later changed to a no contest.

    Yeah and Rahman and Toney was originally a TKO for Toney too but theychanged that to a NC aswel.

    It will be a travesty if they dont do the same with the Hopkins - Dawson fight.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golden Boy files protest to Ring, WBC, and CAC, over the Hopkins ruling

    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    This fight should and will be ruled a no contest. It reminds of the Nate Campbell/Tim Bradley fight a little while back that was called a win by Bradley but later changed to a no contest.

    Yeah and Rahman and Toney was originally a TKO for Toney too but theychanged that to a NC aswel.

    It will be a travesty if they dont do the same with the Hopkins - Dawson fight.
    I don't know about a travesty, Hopkins had already 'leaned' on and pushed Dawson down to the canvas earlier in the fight, when Hopkins tried to do the same shit again Dawson retaliated. Nobody seems to remember that Hopkins was doing something illegal before Dawson pushed him off, Hopkins wasn't an "innocent victim" in all of this.

    That's just the way I see it, let the decision stand as is, (TKO -2 for Dawson), but order a rematch to settle it.
    Last edited by Mars_ax; 10-18-2011 at 09:49 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-17-2011, 10:24 PM
  2. No change in the ruling of Thompson-Arvin?
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-16-2008, 05:27 AM
  3. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-15-2008, 12:50 PM
  4. NSAC Changes Diaz-Gomi Ruling From PRIDE To 'No Contest'
    By SalTheButcher in forum Mixed Martial Arts
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-14-2007, 11:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing