Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

[Nameless]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

[miron_lang]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

That sounds like you want to be poetic or something. do you have 7 clear rounds for marquez?

[Nameless]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

That sounds like you want to be poetic or something. do you have 7 clear rounds for marquez?

Yes I have 7 rounds for Marquez (which i think he won clearly) and no, I don't make farty poetry though I can write one for you if you want.

[miron_lang]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

That sounds like you want to be poetic or something. do you have 7 clear rounds for marquez?

Yes I have 7 rounds for Marquez (which i think he won clearly) and no, I don't make farty poetry though I can write one for you if you want.

What are those rounds that you thing Marquez clearly won? can you post it here pls?

[Fenster]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

This thread unequivocally proves it wasn't a robbery.

Whether you/we think Marquez won or not is irrelevant. The facts are people were undecided on virtually EVERY round.

How can it possibly be a robbery if people can't even agree on who won what rounds? Utterly hilarious.

[erics44]

i still havent seen the fight

but the bit about the expectation on pac rings true to me

everyone was saying he was gonna blast marquez, he obviously didnt and marquez's performace was a suprise, which perhaps gave him a few more points in peoples eyes

[FinitoElDinamita]

i still havent seen the fight

but the bit about the expectation on pac rings true to me

everyone was saying he was gonna blast marquez, he obviously didnt and marquez's performace was a suprise, which perhaps gave him a few more points in peoples eyes

No eric. It was a classic robjob and even 95% of other elite boxers out there agree.

U gotta watch the fight first before commenting.

[erics44]

i still havent seen the fight

but the bit about the expectation on pac rings true to me

everyone was saying he was gonna blast marquez, he obviously didnt and marquez's performace was a suprise, which perhaps gave him a few more points in peoples eyes

No eric. It was a classic robjob and even 95% of other elite boxers out there agree.

U gotta watch the fight first before commenting.

youre probly right

id like to watch it too but i cant find anywhere i can without paying for it

[Nameless]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

This thread unequivocally proves it wasn't a robbery.

Whether you/we think Marquez won or not is irrelevant. The facts are people were undecided on virtually EVERY round.

How can it possibly be a robbery if people can't even agree on who won what rounds? Utterly hilarious.

Now tell me that it is clear that Pacquiao won by 2 rounds. Everybody agrees (or almost) that Marquez won that hand down. The "not everybody agrees on the same round system" argument is one of the most ludicrous I've seen because for every damn match (except for the rare one sided whooping) the mass voting situation would be the same. Following that argument, we could turn down every robbery because in every case people wouldn't agree all on the same rounds.

[Fenster]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

This thread unequivocally proves it wasn't a robbery.

Whether you/we think Marquez won or not is irrelevant. The facts are people were undecided on virtually EVERY round.

How can it possibly be a robbery if people can't even agree on who won what rounds? Utterly hilarious.

Now tell me that it is clear that Pacquiao won by 2 rounds. Everybody agrees (or almost) that Marquez won that hand down. The "not everybody agrees on the same round system" argument is one of the most ludicrous I've seen because for every damn match (except for the rare one sided whooping) the mass voting situation would be the same. Following that argument, we could turn down every robbery because in every case people wouldn't agree all on the same rounds.

You score boxing matches by the round. The judges have to hand a score in at the end of every round.

In almost ALL robberies people will be in agreement on the exact rounds won. Real robberies are clear cut.

However, in this fight, the rounds were so ambiguous that FIVE random people, that scored it for Marquez, gave Pacquiao NINE different rounds between them.

Which means, even if the majority think Marquez won, it's highly probable using the WINNING Marquez scorecards to find Pac the winner. You can't argue with that.

NO robbery. Fact.

[generalbulldog]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

This thread unequivocally proves it wasn't a robbery.

Whether you/we think Marquez won or not is irrelevant. The facts are people were undecided on virtually EVERY round.

How can it possibly be a robbery if people can't even agree on who won what rounds? Utterly hilarious.

Now tell me that it is clear that Pacquiao won by 2 rounds. Everybody agrees (or almost) that Marquez won that hand down. The "not everybody agrees on the same round system" argument is one of the most ludicrous I've seen because for every damn match (except for the rare one sided whooping) the mass voting situation would be the same. Following that argument, we could turn down every robbery because in every case people wouldn't agree all on the same rounds.

You score boxing matches by the round. The judges have to hand a score in at the end of every round.

In almost ALL robberies people will be in agreement on the exact rounds won. Real robberies are clear cut.

However, in this fight, the rounds were so ambiguous that FIVE random people, that scored it for Marquez, gave Pacquiao NINE different rounds between them.

Which means, even if the majority think Marquez won, it's highly probable using the WINNING Marquez scorecards to find Pac the winner. You can't argue with that.

NO robbery. Fact.

Well I think that's it about this debate about the "robbery." You had a lot of ambiguous or very close rounds. People are acting like it's Holyfield-Lewis I or Whitaker-Chavez, now those are robberies.

[ninjaspy3]

I am willing to agree it was not a robbery. But regardless Marquez deserved the win. There is a reason the majority of viewers think so. The fact that none of the judges thought so is simply shady.

Close fight or not, what is the likelyhood that not a single one of the 3 judges thought Marquez won.

It stinks. Cant believe how people just cant see that.

So.. in summary... not a robbery, but suspicious as hell.