No answer yet?
Why is Ricardo Lopez with 52 fights 51 wins and one draw not there?
No answer yet?
Why is Ricardo Lopez with 52 fights 51 wins and one draw not there?
because every name included in my list deserves it better ?
and because d answer is in my top fighters from every country thread . i don't have him in my top 10 of Mexico either .
most of d reasons r in that thread :
http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...y-country.html
enjoy my replies 2 your friends' spam , until i stopped replying 2d spammers that is .
ignore my replies and i will ignore yours .
You do know he fought for and defended WBC title 21 times then fought the undefeated WBO champ to unify; then fought the undefeated WBA champ that was a technical draw due to an accidental head butt.
So what does he do? He fights him again,this time Alverez comes in over weight and cant win anyway, Lopez is champ by default: but Lopez being a champion takes him on anyway and beats him, then he vacates all titles moving up in weight and takes the IBF world title from the reining champ in the next division up,two defenses later he faces Zolani petello who had held the Ibf in the weight below (the only one he didnt get to fight for ) So now he lopez beats him at the next weight up retaining the Ibf then Lopez retires undefeated.
Whats not to love?
this is d same shit RJJ's , Ray Leonard's and Joe Louis' "greatness" is excused by .
and Markegiano's , Holmes' and Calzaghe's .
fight as many bums and corpses as u can , as long as u don't lose it's gr8 .
Based purely on worthless , meaningless numerics and worthless toy belts that every1 loves 2 criticize .
If some1 fights d best and loses a competitive fight by judges' verdict , i count it 2 his credit .
But when some1 just doesn't fight any1 , there is nothing 2 count 2 his credit , and this is Lopez' case .
Yeah... SRL fought LOTS of bums. His entire career he fought 2 guys with losing records. He defeated Wilfredo Benitez, Roberto Duran, Thomas Hearns, and Marvin Hagler. He fought Duran and Hearns on more than one occasion. Unlike JCC, who was 12-0 when he first fought someone with a winning record, and first fought someone other than a corpse, outside Mexico, in his 44th pro fight.
You definitely know your stuff.
That is the biggest crock of shit I've read in my entire life.
If there was an Olympic event for talking shit, you'd win GOLD, SILVER, and BRONZE.
BTW..... I hope you know we're all just going along with this charade for our own amusement.
We know you're really doing this for the attention, and a little "shock value."
![]()
Last edited by Andre; 07-29-2012 at 02:55 AM.
You make my head hurt.
IDK , he simply did not have very good fighters in his weights so it is possible that he did not duck any1 in his weight . But he still did not fight any1 either , so d bottom line is that he fought no1 , his record is empty , he is unproven and a big unknown even if a relatively famous unknown , and i'd rather rank men whom were willing 2 fight d best and proved they could at least last d distance vs d best .
Last edited by THE THIRD MAN; 07-29-2012 at 07:42 AM.
Lamar Clark is the greatest heavyweight fighter of all time.
There can be no argument.
![]()
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks