Fury v Wilder on B-Hop undercard...?

[ross]

Cunningham and Johnson (Or Maddalone) are top heavies? That doesn't make Fury good, that just proves how shitty this HW era is.

Again, if Fury has accomplished so much, then why hasn't he fought Thompson, Pulev, or Price?

Thompson was viewed as a soft touch, so much so he was being brought in as a name opponent for someone who hadnt fought above british journeyman level. The fact he beat Price shows how shit Price is and proves people like me right that knew there was a reason the level of opponent was platauing for a reason and that Thompson was a ridiculous jump in class.

Pulev struggled with Thompson and was made to look mediocre.

Fury on the other hand had an easier time with Johnson than Vitali did and even Malik Scott has said that when asked how good Fury is (he has sparred afury and admitted Fury burst both his ear drums in sparring).

Cunningham would be a 220 to 230lb fighter if he carried as much fat as Haye. He is a very skilled fighter and should have been given the decision over Adamek who is ranked by some in the top 5 and battered Arreola.

Fury is doing the business against those who are willing to fight him. Arreola was one of the names who turned the fight down which is why Fury had to go with Cunningham. Believe what you want but Fury is in the who needs him club. As easy as you lt think he is to beat, no one wants to fight him because he is a nightmare for anyone. He has good stamina and puts more than one or two punches together and can fight inside. Hes still learning, hasnt even fought for a title yet but his progression has been very good. He was put in with the english champion after only 8 months as a pro, some felt he lost and he rematched him and knocked him out. It took Prices team 3 years before they thought their man could be trusted against the same fighter. His progression was glacial for a reason. Price and Haye couldnt not get past their first hurdles.

For those of you here who know SEANIE , then im afraid to announce he has just lost his title to this guy .

Al your just annoyed because you cant refute any of that.

Fury has earnt his place and has "world" champs like Haye worrying about a cut when its only going to take 2 rounds to dispatch Fury. He wasn't going to even land a shot.

[Dark Lord Al]

Cunningham and Johnson (Or Maddalone) are top heavies? That doesn't make Fury good, that just proves how shitty this HW era is.

Again, if Fury has accomplished so much, then why hasn't he fought Thompson, Pulev, or Price?

Thompson was viewed as a soft touch, so much so he was being brought in as a name opponent for someone who hadnt fought above british journeyman level. The fact he beat Price shows how shit Price is and proves people like me right that knew there was a reason the level of opponent was platauing for a reason and that Thompson was a ridiculous jump in class.

Pulev struggled with Thompson and was made to look mediocre.

Fury on the other hand had an easier time with Johnson than Vitali did and even Malik Scott has said that when asked how good Fury is (he has sparred afury and admitted Fury burst both his ear drums in sparring).

Cunningham would be a 220 to 230lb fighter if he carried as much fat as Haye. He is a very skilled fighter and should have been given the decision over Adamek who is ranked by some in the top 5 and battered Arreola.

Fury is doing the business against those who are willing to fight him. Arreola was one of the names who turned the fight down which is why Fury had to go with Cunningham. Believe what you want but Fury is in the who needs him club. As easy as you lt think he is to beat, no one wants to fight him because he is a nightmare for anyone. He has good stamina and puts more than one or two punches together and can fight inside. Hes still learning, hasnt even fought for a title yet but his progression has been very good. He was put in with the english champion after only 8 months as a pro, some felt he lost and he rematched him and knocked him out. It took Prices team 3 years before they thought their man could be trusted against the same fighter. His progression was glacial for a reason. Price and Haye couldnt not get past their first hurdles.

For those of you here who know SEANIE , then im afraid to announce he has just lost his title to this guy .

Al your just annoyed because you cant refute any of that.

Fury has earnt his place and has "world" champs like Haye worrying about a cut when its only going to take 2 rounds to dispatch Fury. He wasn't going to even land a shot.

You seem to be taking the cancelation of the fight as a win for Fury , that is pretty puzzling , the fight didn't happen and your opinion isn't shared by anyone apart from titofan and a few others , the rest of us just think it was a cut in sparring.
If Haye cut himself then that is a disgrace but there is no evidence of it.
As for fury give him a title shot against Wlad for me , because the first puncher he meets he will lose as he has a glass jaw , I've stated many times that I actually don't like Haye either , id be cheering for either of the brothers grim against Haye or fury.

[ross]

Im not taking ut as a win for Fury.

In fact I'm pretty sure there are a few sighs of relief in here that Fury has had his chance to beat Haye taken away from him because it would turn all their beliefs and what they thought was their knowledge of boxing on its head that Fury was capable of beating Haye or that theyd been conned in to thinking Haye was a great fighter that would never lose to such a fool and would have such an easy time the fight would end inside 2 rounds

[Dark Lord Al]

Im not taking ut as a win for Fury.

In fact I'm pretty sure there are a few sighs of relief in here that Fury has had his chance to beat Haye taken away from him because it would turn all their beliefs and what they thought was their knowledge of boxing on its head that Fury was capable of beating Haye or that theyd been conned in to thinking Haye was a great fighter that would never lose to such a fool and would have such an easy time the fight would end inside 2 rounds

The people who believed Fury would win are you and a few others , the bookies hade Haye favourite , and most boxing pundits favoured Haye .
So the rest of the world where wrong to favour Haye ? , interesting thought , did you even feel the need to visit planet earth ?

[ross]

Im not taking ut as a win for Fury.

In fact I'm pretty sure there are a few sighs of relief in here that Fury has had his chance to beat Haye taken away from him because it would turn all their beliefs and what they thought was their knowledge of boxing on its head that Fury was capable of beating Haye or that theyd been conned in to thinking Haye was a great fighter that would never lose to such a fool and would have such an easy time the fight would end inside 2 rounds

The people who believed Fury would win are you and a few others , the bookies hade Haye favourite , and most boxing pundits favoured Haye .
So the rest of the world where wrong to favour Haye ? , interesting thought , did you even feel the need to visit planet earth ?

The bookies are going on past achievements but arent looking at the tangibles.

Like why Haye only fought certain people, scraped past Valuev and didnt really deserve the win, how poor he looked against Wlad, regardless of result how shaky he was looking against Chisora, a man Fury had beaten a couple of years before hand when Fury was out of shape, the amount of down time hes had. Or... how in reality, huge and difficult it will be to land on a switched on Fury and if Haye doesnt stop him early how will he cope with Furys size, workrate and stamina late on.

Everyone, is gong on a knockdown that happened just seconds in to the second round against Cunningham. Fuck the fact that he was still there in the 7th and was the first man to KO Steve.....

Like I have said before, what would the bookmakers have thought about Cassius Clay who had been dropped twice against Sonny Banks and Henry Cooper who weighed 195lb and 185lb and was gifted a decision against Doug Jones. What odds would they have given for him facing the monster Sonny Liston?

[Dark Lord Al]

Are you for real ?, im stating fact you are not , if we took SADDO'S as an example.
We all like boxing , so out of all of our opinions most people thought Haye would win by KO , well that would be similar whoever you asked , like any survey , you ask so many people for their opinion.
Those are the facts , you are in a minority , its opinions , until they fight we will never know who is right.
Get over it , you are making yourself look like a teen , by constantly going over old ground.
An example of an expert asked , Colin Hart from the Sun , he said he just couldn't see Fury's chin holding up against a big puncher , that's his opinion , Haye by early ko.
You constantly find fault with Haye's win column yet he was world champ at 2 weights , yet you big up Johnson , Cunnigham , yet one had lost all but one round to Vitali and then to Tor Hamer , Cunnigham had lost 3 of his last 4 going into the Fury fight that's what the record books say.
You are totally in love with Fury you talk no sense. Most of us here don't care for Haye much either , but you just cant see how daft you sound.
When Fury going in with a really big puncher and wins , you can come on here and big him up , until then let keep it in prospective please.

[ross]

Perspective, I may be quite strongly behind Fury in this fight but thats for the reasons mentioned. I think he has Hayes number.

I dont lambast or criticise anyone for believing otherwise unlike you and others on here in a weird cliquey group where no one else is allowed a differing opinion.

If it was a Klitschko or Pulev I may feel different but the fact Haye is a puncher didnt help him on Wlads chin which is just as poor as Furys.

As for me bigging up Johnson and Cunningham, those two also beat Hayes heavyweight wins.