Well when ranking the top ten greatest you got look at a few things really. That being resume, defenses, and how long they reign over as champ. With Wald resume is the kicker really but i don't think its as bad as most think it is. Bryde, Chagve, Haye, Peter, Povetkin and Maybe Brewster besides the 70's and 90's i think those guys would be fine with most of the contenders of all the other eras not saying the champs. Not sure were to rank the man but if he keeps being champ and winning ever fight with out losing hardly any rounds its going to get hard not to.
the 2 klitschkos suck donkey dick, backpeddling fools, only unreachable due to standing 6 foot 7 inches and having long motherfucking arms like a fucking orangutan.
Fair enough Brock but do you think they could beat some the greats i mean 1900 to 1960s i give them chance to beat most of the fights and the 80's. They maybe tall and boring but if they keep winning and beating people it is going to be hard not to rank them i would think maybe not.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks