Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
You are purposely being argumentative. There is no way you can dismiss the achievements of this guy as anything less than the most dominant career in history!

The WBO is now recognised as a major belt, when it was established it took some time to be regarded as such in the HW division.

Wlad has unified the WBO, IBF, WBA major belts as well as the IBO and recognised as "The Ring" HW champion for a very long time... That is the REAL HW champion.

Where the hell do you get this notion he only held 1 belt? He's been DEPRIVED of only 1 belt more like it. And everybody knows the only reason he could never get his hands on the WBC was because his brother had it.

Now who is better out of Vitali and Wlad is a matter of dispute, but I think it's fair to say that later in the game it has been Wladimir who definitely had the upper hand.

I seen Wlad win back one title after another right after his last defeat and then defend them successfully ever since.

And you want to compare Mike Tyson's (bless him) 6 fight defenses to this!

Get the hell out of here mate! Pure nutbaggery at it's finest @ross !!!
Your full of shit!

The Klitschkos had the money in the division, if they wanted to get those titles they could have.

Who was better out of Vitali and Wlad? Vitali was, so Wlad is only dominant since Vitalis retirement and he still needs to unify to be the only heavyweight champ.

Do you think its possible for him to unify or worried he might lose in the process of trying?