Re: Was a young Robin Reid better than George Groves?

Originally Posted by
ross

Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Master said he doubted Reid would beat Froch, I pointed out that he had lost to Froch, but not during Reid's prime. I added my opinion that I thought Froch would likely beat him in his prime too.
That's it. Do you think I was trying to infer something more than that?
You brought up the result of the fight as if it was relevant but as I pointed out, beating a 37 year old Reid is as relevant as Calzaghes win over Eubank, Marcianos over Louis and Holmes over Ali.
The point is prime Froch beats prime Reid. Styles do make fights and Groves is more fluid and faster than Reid so I think George would beat him.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Bookmarks