Re: Was a young Robin Reid better than George Groves?

Originally Posted by
AdamGB

Originally Posted by
ross

Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Master said he doubted Reid would beat Froch, I pointed out that he had lost to Froch, but not during Reid's prime. I added my opinion that I thought Froch would likely beat him in his prime too.
That's it. Do you think I was trying to infer something more than that?
You brought up the result of the fight as if it was relevant but as I pointed out, beating a 37 year old Reid is as relevant as Calzaghes win over Eubank, Marcianos over Louis and Holmes over Ali.
Relevant to what exactly? I replied directly to Master because I wasn't sure if he knew the two had met, that's it. I can't simplify it for you any more, I wish I could!...
If I was trying to make more of it than that then I wouldn't have went out of my way to point out that Reid was old at the time would I?!
Jesus... Only you would get excited over and try to dissect such a simple post...

I have to agree Ross, I am seeing a whole new side of you. I had forgotten Froch had fought Reid must have been some crazy come back from Reid.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Bookmarks