US and Coalition strikes Syria

[Kirkland Laing]

Hmmm, I see November 5, 1998: Condemns the decision by Iraq of 31 October 1998 to cease cooperation" with UN inspectors as "a flagrant violation" of UNSCR 687 and other resolutions.

Iraq must provide "immediate, complete and unconditional cooperation" with UN and IAEA inspectors.


Who was President in 1998 again?


That's what I thought, so shut your commie fucking face and go back in your hole you despicable waste of oxygen.

So after having reality prove you wrong for the millionth time you've gone back to dodging the question again. Would you really have invaded Syria and if so, how?

[El Kabong]

Hmmm, I see November 5, 1998: Condemns the decision by Iraq of 31 October 1998 to cease cooperation" with UN inspectors as "a flagrant violation" of UNSCR 687 and other resolutions.

Iraq must provide "immediate, complete and unconditional cooperation" with UN and IAEA inspectors.


Who was President in 1998 again?


That's what I thought, so shut your commie fucking face and go back in your hole you despicable waste of oxygen.

So after having reality prove you wrong for the millionth time you've gone back to dodging the question again. Would you really have invaded Syria and if so, how?

Are we in Bizarro world or something? How exactly has reality proved me wrong? If anything reality is something that is tied to MY argument not yours space cadet.

Saddam Hussein REFUSED ACCESS TO UN WEAPONS INSPECTORS and he also touted he had WMD's if you believe Senator John Kerry who ran against President George W. Bush in 2004.

"In UN Security Council Resolution 1441, the United Nations has now affirmed that Saddam Hussein must disarm of face the most serious consequences. Let me make it clear that the burden is resoundingly on Saddam Hussein to live up to the ceasefire agreement he signed and make clear to the world how he disposed of weapons he previously admitted to possessing." - Sen. John Kerry January 23, 2003


Is any of this reaching you Kirkland? Are you being contrary just for fun or because you're just that fucking stupid? I mean I can hammer the shit out of you with the facts all day long because I have the facts, I've posted the facts, and you've posted fuck all but verbose rebuttals which amount to nothing more than a childish "Nuh uh!"

[pacfan]

This is the only place I've seen where rightist americans (I know of no american leftist by international standard)debate with European lefties and they end up never understanding each other. The american lefts are not the same as the left, lefties, or leftists of Europe or elsewhere. The leftie fellows outside america are by the american standard, the reds or the commies. I hope I made it a little clearer and you folks here now understand where they are coming from... But I hate these politics, they muddle issues rather than clarify them. I'd rather be guided by the principle or right and wrong, and the truth...

[walrus]

This is the only place I've seen where rightist americans (I know of no american leftist by international standard)debate with European lefties and they end up never understanding each other. The american lefts are not the same as the left, lefties, or leftists of Europe or elsewhere. The leftie fellows outside america are by the american standard, the reds or the commies. I hope I made it a little clearer and you folks here now understand where they are coming from... But I hate these politics, they muddle issues rather than clarify them. I'd rather be guided by the principle or right and wrong, and the truth...

Pac, American left and rights don't understand each other so its no surprise there is more confusion with Europeans. That's why I live in an underground bunker and remain heavily armed and stoned twenty four seven.

[pacfan]

This is the only place I've seen where rightist americans (I know of no american leftist by international standard)debate with European lefties and they end up never understanding each other. The american lefts are not the same as the left, lefties, or leftists of Europe or elsewhere. The leftie fellows outside america are by the american standard, the reds or the commies. I hope I made it a little clearer and you folks here now understand where they are coming from... But I hate these politics, they muddle issues rather than clarify them. I'd rather be guided by the principle or right and wrong, and the truth...

Pac, American left and rights don't understand each other so its no surprise there is more confusion with Europeans. That's why I live in an underground bunker and remain heavily armed and stoned twenty four seven.

So that means you were really serious about your doomsday thread? You're one of the doomey preppers? Wow, I always wanted to visit one of your camps... well, talkin' 'bout wars and pesitilence...armageddon may not be far away... leave me space there, buds, I'll join you there soon... don't forget - I eat a lot..

[Andre]

This is the only place I've seen where rightist americans (I know of no american leftist by international standard)debate with European lefties and they end up never understanding each other. The american lefts are not the same as the left, lefties, or leftists of Europe or elsewhere. The leftie fellows outside america are by the american standard, the reds or the commies. I hope I made it a little clearer and you folks here now understand where they are coming from... But I hate these politics, they muddle issues rather than clarify them. I'd rather be guided by the principle or right and wrong, and the truth...

Pac, American left and rights don't understand each other so its no surprise there is more confusion with Europeans. That's why I live in an underground bunker and remain heavily armed and stoned twenty four seven.

So that means you were really serious about your doomsday thread? You're one of the doomey preppers? Wow, I always wanted to visit one of your camps... well, talkin' 'bout wars and pesitilence...armageddon may not be far away... leave me space there, buds, I'll join you there soon... don't forget - I eat a lot..

I would not want to come up to the world that was left or the type of people in it. I got enough to last the front panic then out to sea onto the remote sides of these southern islands out here I wouldnt be on the main land with the packs for nothing.

[pacfan]

This is the only place I've seen where rightist americans (I know of no american leftist by international standard)debate with European lefties and they end up never understanding each other. The american lefts are not the same as the left, lefties, or leftists of Europe or elsewhere. The leftie fellows outside america are by the american standard, the reds or the commies. I hope I made it a little clearer and you folks here now understand where they are coming from... But I hate these politics, they muddle issues rather than clarify them. I'd rather be guided by the principle or right and wrong, and the truth...

Pac, American left and rights don't understand each other so its no surprise there is more confusion with Europeans. That's why I live in an underground bunker and remain heavily armed and stoned twenty four seven.

So that means you were really serious about your doomsday thread? You're one of the doomey preppers? Wow, I always wanted to visit one of your camps... well, talkin' 'bout wars and pesitilence...armageddon may not be far away... leave me space there, buds, I'll join you there soon... don't forget - I eat a lot..

I would not want to come up to the world that was left or the type of people in it. I got enough to last the front panic then out to sea onto the remote sides of these southern islands out here I wouldnt be on the main land with the packs for nothing.

I was thinking about nuclear fallout, mate, an arab shooting a nuke at Israel and Israel retaliating with 10 nukes, and you know what that means, right. You don't think about anything when that happens and you'll just have to find the safest place you can think of and I thought these preppers have underground bunkers with food supplies and medicines to last for years. Here in the jungles, there is nowwhere for me to hide, not even from a typhoon! But if you can find me a good place there in the rock of Uluru, I might go there instead, I've always wanted to meditate there at night...

[Kirkland Laing]

Hmmm, I see November 5, 1998: Condemns the decision by Iraq of 31 October 1998 to cease cooperation" with UN inspectors as "a flagrant violation" of UNSCR 687 and other resolutions.

Iraq must provide "immediate, complete and unconditional cooperation" with UN and IAEA inspectors.


Who was President in 1998 again?


That's what I thought, so shut your commie fucking face and go back in your hole you despicable waste of oxygen.

So after having reality prove you wrong for the millionth time you've gone back to dodging the question again. Would you really have invaded Syria and if so, how?

Are we in Bizarro world or something? How exactly has reality proved me wrong? If anything reality is something that is tied to MY argument not yours space cadet.

Saddam Hussein REFUSED ACCESS TO UN WEAPONS INSPECTORS and he also touted he had WMD's if you believe Senator John Kerry who ran against President George W. Bush in 2004.

"In UN Security Council Resolution 1441, the United Nations has now affirmed that Saddam Hussein must disarm of face the most serious consequences. Let me make it clear that the burden is resoundingly on Saddam Hussein to live up to the ceasefire agreement he signed and make clear to the world how he disposed of weapons he previously admitted to possessing." - Sen. John Kerry January 23, 2003


Is any of this reaching you Kirkland? Are you being contrary just for fun or because you're just that fucking stupid? I mean I can hammer the shit out of you with the facts all day long because I have the facts, I've posted the facts, and you've posted fuck all but verbose rebuttals which amount to nothing more than a childish "Nuh uh!"

Obviously things you read each day knock the things you read the previous day off your little shelf and remembering a conversation you had a day before is impossible for you.

Here's what I originally said, followed by what you said, cut and pasted.

ME: George W Bush was proactive in invading Iraq to protect America from Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction and that proactiveness has led to the current situation. Perhaps being proactive isn't such a good idea.

YOU:You keep spouting off about the WMD's (good little liberal you are) without realizing that that was one of a number of factors which lead to the invasion of Iraq. Certainly the invasion could have been avoided but for Saddam's refusal to allow UN weapons inspectors full access to his country.


ME: This posts starts silly and gets sillier. Whenever you say "you do realise" I know I'm then going to read a whole load of wrong and you don't disappoint.

Long story short.

Saddam let the inspectors in....................


You should be able to fit those limited quotes on your shelf all at the same time without risking shelf overload. Yes?