US and Coalition strikes Syria

[Scrap]

Why is it that all these countrys, that are attacked have two things in common. Mineral wealth and no Rothschild bank. Could someone explain.

Because Alex Jones?

is it his fault.

[El Kabong]

Why is it that all these countrys, that are attacked have two things in common. Mineral wealth and no Rothschild bank. Could someone explain.

Because Alex Jones?

is it his fault.

Nope but it's good for his brand of radio

[brocktonblockbust]

You can't discount everything he says.

[Beanz]

If you put on a blindfold and throw a hundred darts at a board, one of them might hit the bullseye. It's not a validation of that method though. Better to look before taking aim.

[El Kabong]

[Kirkland Laing]

Hmmm, I see November 5, 1998: Condemns the decision by Iraq of 31 October 1998 to cease cooperation" with UN inspectors as "a flagrant violation" of UNSCR 687 and other resolutions.

Iraq must provide "immediate, complete and unconditional cooperation" with UN and IAEA inspectors.


Who was President in 1998 again?


That's what I thought, so shut your commie fucking face and go back in your hole you despicable waste of oxygen.

So after having reality prove you wrong for the millionth time you've gone back to dodging the question again. Would you really have invaded Syria and if so, how?

[Kirkland Laing]

Why is it that all these countrys, that are attacked have two things in common. Mineral wealth and no Rothschild bank. Could someone explain.

Banking isn't run by one family or ethnic group mate. Rothschild as an institution is so last century.

[El Kabong]

Hmmm, I see November 5, 1998: Condemns the decision by Iraq of 31 October 1998 to cease cooperation" with UN inspectors as "a flagrant violation" of UNSCR 687 and other resolutions.

Iraq must provide "immediate, complete and unconditional cooperation" with UN and IAEA inspectors.


Who was President in 1998 again?


That's what I thought, so shut your commie fucking face and go back in your hole you despicable waste of oxygen.

So after having reality prove you wrong for the millionth time you've gone back to dodging the question again. Would you really have invaded Syria and if so, how?

Are we in Bizarro world or something? How exactly has reality proved me wrong? If anything reality is something that is tied to MY argument not yours space cadet.

Saddam Hussein REFUSED ACCESS TO UN WEAPONS INSPECTORS and he also touted he had WMD's if you believe Senator John Kerry who ran against President George W. Bush in 2004.

"In UN Security Council Resolution 1441, the United Nations has now affirmed that Saddam Hussein must disarm of face the most serious consequences. Let me make it clear that the burden is resoundingly on Saddam Hussein to live up to the ceasefire agreement he signed and make clear to the world how he disposed of weapons he previously admitted to possessing." - Sen. John Kerry January 23, 2003


Is any of this reaching you Kirkland? Are you being contrary just for fun or because you're just that fucking stupid? I mean I can hammer the shit out of you with the facts all day long because I have the facts, I've posted the facts, and you've posted fuck all but verbose rebuttals which amount to nothing more than a childish "Nuh uh!"

[pacfan]

This is the only place I've seen where rightist americans (I know of no american leftist by international standard)debate with European lefties and they end up never understanding each other. The american lefts are not the same as the left, lefties, or leftists of Europe or elsewhere. The leftie fellows outside america are by the american standard, the reds or the commies. I hope I made it a little clearer and you folks here now understand where they are coming from... But I hate these politics, they muddle issues rather than clarify them. I'd rather be guided by the principle or right and wrong, and the truth...

[walrus]

This is the only place I've seen where rightist americans (I know of no american leftist by international standard)debate with European lefties and they end up never understanding each other. The american lefts are not the same as the left, lefties, or leftists of Europe or elsewhere. The leftie fellows outside america are by the american standard, the reds or the commies. I hope I made it a little clearer and you folks here now understand where they are coming from... But I hate these politics, they muddle issues rather than clarify them. I'd rather be guided by the principle or right and wrong, and the truth...

Pac, American left and rights don't understand each other so its no surprise there is more confusion with Europeans. That's why I live in an underground bunker and remain heavily armed and stoned twenty four seven.

[El Kabong]

The left, American or otherwise is defeatist and consistently working AGAINST any progress. Commies, socialists, anarchists. ...they are all worthless

[Beanz]

The left, American or otherwise is defeatist and consistently working AGAINST any progress. Commies, socialists, anarchists. ...they are all worthless

Better throw out your record collection then.

[El Kabong]

Well aware of that Beanz but there's a reason those people are musicians and not politicians

[El Kabong]

So Kirkland ....about those WMDs

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...=tw-share&_r=1

[Andre]

The left, American or otherwise is defeatist and consistently working AGAINST any progress. Commies, socialists, anarchists. ...they are all worthless

You call them Liberals ?

Our Liberal branch are the rich politicians here, right wing. Labour party are our left.
We also drive on the other side of the road and all hang upside down off the bottom of the Earth as well.