Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Hmmm, I see November 5, 1998: Condemns the decision by Iraq of 31 October 1998 to cease cooperation" with UN inspectors as "a flagrant violation" of UNSCR 687 and other resolutions.

Iraq must provide "immediate, complete and unconditional cooperation" with UN and IAEA inspectors.



Who was President in 1998 again?


That's what I thought, so shut your commie fucking face and go back in your hole you despicable waste of oxygen.
So after having reality prove you wrong for the millionth time you've gone back to dodging the question again. Would you really have invaded Syria and if so, how?
Are we in Bizarro world or something? How exactly has reality proved me wrong? If anything reality is something that is tied to MY argument not yours space cadet.

Saddam Hussein REFUSED ACCESS TO UN WEAPONS INSPECTORS and he also touted he had WMD's if you believe Senator John Kerry who ran against President George W. Bush in 2004.

"In UN Security Council Resolution 1441, the United Nations has now affirmed that Saddam Hussein must disarm of face the most serious consequences. Let me make it clear that the burden is resoundingly on Saddam Hussein to live up to the ceasefire agreement he signed and make clear to the world how he disposed of weapons he previously admitted to possessing." - Sen. John Kerry January 23, 2003


Is any of this reaching you Kirkland? Are you being contrary just for fun or because you're just that fucking stupid? I mean I can hammer the shit out of you with the facts all day long because I have the facts, I've posted the facts, and you've posted fuck all but verbose rebuttals which amount to nothing more than a childish "Nuh uh!"
Obviously things you read each day knock the things you read the previous day off your little shelf and remembering a conversation you had a day before is impossible for you.

Here's what I originally said, followed by what you said, cut and pasted.

ME: George W Bush was proactive in invading Iraq to protect America from Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction and that proactiveness has led to the current situation. Perhaps being proactive isn't such a good idea.

YOU:You keep spouting off about the WMD's (good little liberal you are) without realizing that that was one of a number of factors which lead to the invasion of Iraq. Certainly the invasion could have been avoided but for Saddam's refusal to allow UN weapons inspectors full access to his country.


ME: This posts starts silly and gets sillier. Whenever you say "you do realise" I know I'm then going to read a whole load of wrong and you don't disappoint.

Long story short.

Saddam let the inspectors in....................



You should be able to fit those limited quotes on your shelf all at the same time without risking shelf overload. Yes?