Re: David Haye discusses next move with Vitali Klitschko over breakfast

Originally Posted by
ross

Originally Posted by
Andre
How many you want? Just one? Tyson; but you'll have to add harder hitting more flexible and ambidextrous to your list as well.
Don't forget takes a better punch and beat 3 defending champions, the lineal champ, defended the unified belts 6 times as the undisputed champ (not done since).
Hayes heavyweight run while ok as he did win a belt does nothing in all time standings and if he is so great in such a poor division he should be up there but the fold hard reality is he has really achieved fuck all at heavy. How many fighters over the last 20 years can say they won a heavyweight title? Loads!!
I agree with your post in full ross.
Like I said, Tyson has other features I wasn't considering. And yes, I don't MEAN to overrate Haye's achievements. But I will acknowledge them for what they are.
A problem on all these forums, is that you can either SLAM a boxers achievements or totally exaggerate it. But if you try to take the middle road and look at them objectively, you get scalded from both sides of the fence!
"Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"
Lennox Lewis
Bookmarks