
Originally Posted by
ross

Originally Posted by
Fenster
Yeah it's about opinions. The question asked - who is the best and worst? We can't prove Fury is a better fighter than Lee Haskins, just that on paper he beat a more famous champion.
Fury is THE man in his division, it doesn't mean he's unbeatable or even the best fighter.
Brook, DeGale, Frampton, Quigg and Selby all operate in far, far tougher divisons than the heavyweight one.
In his division he is the best fighter!!

He beat and unbeatable top ten all time great in his home town easy. Tyson is easily the best fighter in Britain hard to swallow as it is for you!
Do any of the others really stand a chance at beating the best in their divisions?
The fighters you mentioned may fight in more competative divisions but have they beaten the best n their division? Are they capable of it? De Gale was lucky to get past Bute! Does Brook really stand a chance against Pacquiao? Frampton amd Quigg would beat Rigo

Exactly.
Bute/Dirrell are superior boxers to Wlad. Quigg and Frampton are in a division with Rigo and Donaire. Superior boxers to Wlad. Brook doesn't just have Pac but also Bradley, Thurman, Porter, Khan, Spence etc, all superior boxers to Wlad. Lee Selby has Loma, Russell jr, Santa Cruz etc.
Most of these guys are in or around the PPV top ten. Neither Fury or any other heavyweight is. (check The RING mag)
Tyson is the best fighter in the UK in your OPINION not mine. Tyson isn't even the best heavyweight in my opinion.
Bookmarks