Let's debunk the whole "Fury got robbed" myth

[ykdadamaja]

Is this like the Mayweather v Canelo fight? Or the Mayweather v Pac fight? Did you watch it in slow motion with the sound off?

[Batman]

It wasn't a robbery, I had it 114-112, a draw is acceptable, one judges scorecard was ridiculous.

A touch of inept scoring but no robbery with the final result.

[Batman]

Actually the only difference between your card after you re-watched it and mine from when the fight was live was that I gave round 1 to Fury hence the 114-112

[palmerq]

It wasn't a robbery, I had it 114-112, a draw is acceptable, one judges scorecard was ridiculous.

A touch of inept scoring but no robbery with the final result.

I think mexicans tend to score like that, if it ne guy is backing away and the other going forward throwing more they give it to the aggressor... Not saying it's a good scorecard or anything but I dont think it was the work of a crook. Funny how different things mean someone won a round to different people.

[imp]

Not a robbery.

Fury nipped it but it’s not a robbery.

Roy Jones getting the silver in the olympics is a robbery.

In Wilders defence he is the much much smaller man and still showed KO power in the last round.

I wanted Fury to win and as the much much bigger man I feel he should have pressed the action more in certain parts of the fight.

[TitoFan]

Is this like the Mayweather v Canelo fight? Or the Mayweather v Pac fight? Did you watch it in slow motion with the sound off?

You obviously did not read the post. Thus I won't bother responding.

[Master]

Fury won 10 rounds to 2 when I scored it so I disagree with your scoring.

[TitoFan]

Fury won 10 rounds to 2 when I scored it so I disagree with your scoring.

You only gave Wilder those rounds in which he knocked down Fury??

Okay. I guess we disagree by a whole lot.

[nuggetdotcom]

Fury won 10 rounds to 2 when I scored it so I disagree with your scoring.

You only gave Wilder those rounds in which he knocked down Fury??

Okay. I guess we disagree by a whole lot.

As mentioned in a previous post, ex champ and now trainer Dave Coldwell had it 10-2, if you are going to analyse anything look at BOXERS scoring, not armchair critics, bent judges or 'media' reps with tame promoters.

[Master]

Fury won 10 rounds to 2 when I scored it so I disagree with your scoring.

You only gave Wilder those rounds in which he knocked down Fury??

Okay. I guess we disagree by a whole lot.

As mentioned in a previous post, ex champ and now trainer Dave Coldwell had it 10-2, if you are going to analyse anything look at BOXERS scoring, not armchair critics, bent judges or 'media' reps with tame promoters.

Whilst I agree with you for this fight.

I think you said the same thing with Canelo v GGG with a lot of the professionals having Saul the winner but I disagreed with their scoring for that fight.

[Freedom]

I scored it 115-111 for Fury.

I gave Wilder one round, the closest round besides the two knock-down rounds. Even in the rounds Fury was knocked down, for the rest of the rounds he boxed far better than Wilder.

Yes, it was a robbery. Fury clearly won. But he should have remained fully focused and not got knocked down that second time, you should be especially careful when you're fighting in a foreign country.

For the rematch, Fury will probably be back to his best fighting shape and may even stop Wilder. Hopefully he'll remain focused for the entire fight as he was against Chisora and Klitschko.