Let's debunk the whole "Fury got robbed" myth

**Batman** · 12-10-2018 01:08 PM

It wasn't a robbery, I had it 114-112, a draw is acceptable, one judges scorecard was ridiculous.

A touch of inept scoring but no robbery with the final result.

**Batman** · 12-10-2018 01:15 PM

Actually the only difference between your card after you re-watched it and mine from when the fight was live was that I gave round 1 to Fury hence the 114-112

**palmerq** · 12-10-2018 02:58 PM

Originally Posted by Batman

It wasn't a robbery, I had it 114-112, a draw is acceptable, one judges scorecard was ridiculous.

A touch of inept scoring but no robbery with the final result.

I think mexicans tend to score like that, if it ne guy is backing away and the other going forward throwing more they give it to the aggressor... Not saying it's a good scorecard or anything but I dont think it was the work of a crook. Funny how different things mean someone won a round to different people.

**imp** · 12-10-2018 03:07 PM

Not a robbery.

Fury nipped it but it’s not a robbery.

Roy Jones getting the silver in the olympics is a robbery.

In Wilders defence he is the much much smaller man and still showed KO power in the last round.

I wanted Fury to win and as the much much bigger man I feel he should have pressed the action more in certain parts of the fight.