Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?

[Beanz]

There are no fallacies in my argument.

It is a pretty simple and irrefutable fact that there is no such thing as scientific proof. All we have are the best possible theories that can be constructed to explain reality.

These theories are tested again and again to prove that they are the closest we can get to 'knowimg' anything. True knowledge. Truth.

Being an immature naive child you have rejected this idea of knowing anything and would rather believe in your own fictional made up stories about an individual with no scientific expertise carrying out a one off test that will back up your fairy tale belief.

Like Manuel, you know nothing, and don't even have the excuse of English not being your first language.

all you bring to the table are fallacies. talking about so called experts is a fallacy because it is not your proving your belief true. theories are just ideas. an idea is a belief. unlike water to ice that you can prove to be true. so tell me how you tested again & again to isolate convid to prove your hypothesis is true. & it's knowing with a n not m spergy. you just hold a belief that you can't prove to be true & i am not interested in your beliefs spastic

Ha! Bless

Your rejection of the idea of both the existence of experts and evidence is about as fallacious as one could get.

Science exists because the theory that best explains reality is repeatedly tested by experts. These theories are not just ideas, they are stringently tested models based on the best available knowledge. They are far closer to knowing than anything else in existence.

It is not my hypothesis. I have not formulated the question or carried out the hundreds of studies needed to test it. A single test would prove nothing without the large scale studies that proved their effectivness.

I have taken many PCR and LFT tests over the last 18 months and they all came back as negative until I developed symptoms of covid and the surprise, surprise both the lft and pcr came back as positive.

That is about as close to knowing as I am ever going to get.

You are are talking about fairy tales as you do not understand science or philosophical concepts at all.

i never denied the existence of experts spergy. just that trusting what you have been told by others is not you proving those claims to be true. evidence is not you proving your belief to be true. it's just you providing stories that support your bias. explanations are not you proving your belief to be true. models are not reality. tell me how you tested your theory. you are right that you haven't done shit. you have just put your faith & trust in others. that is a belief spastic. please show me the science you have complete to prove your belief is true & a reality. you don't know & are just happy to believe. that is your right. but that is all it is, just a belief & faith in what someone else has said & i am not interested in your belief

Yes you have denied the existence of experts repeatedly for two years now.

Calling hundreds of thousands of clinicians, scientists, and medics from all over the world who all agree that covid 19 is a virus that can exist outside of the body and be passed on by droplets and aerosols, "so called experts" and claiming that Covid 19 is "convid" again and again, demonstrates quite conclusively your denial of experts.

There is no need to carry out tests or experiments in person unless like you, one doesn't believe in experts, data and evidence.

You can't even express yourself clearly in English. When you say things like

"Evidence is not you proving your belief to be true"

and

"Explanations are not you proving your belief to be true"

Then you can't expect to be taken seriously.

The fallacy you have been repeatedly using with your flawed immature logic is a variant of the appeal to perfection fallacy, a false dichotomy that erroneously limits which options are available. A black and white type of thinking in which you are rejecting the commonly accepted scientific method because it can never be perfect.

It matters not to you that it is the best possible option for knowing something. In fact you are claiming that personal anecdotal evidence, casual, non systematic, uncorroborated claims are the only thing you will accept as 'knowing' something.

That is fallacious bullshit of the lowest order.

you have admitted that you are influenced by others & are happy to just believe rather than prove what has been offered to you to be true. you have admitted that you don't know & only trust others. that is a belief. i'm not interested in your belief. the question has always been how do you know covid is a virus caught from outside the body, through the air or off surfaces. your only answer should be i don't know it to be true but i believe. or you would prove to me how you know that claim is true & you still can't. i'm not interested in what you believe

So now you are telling me what my answer to your question should be?

Ha!

I am not here to blow smoke up your arse or reinforce your deluded fairy tale beliefs.

And no unlike you I am not happy to believe on the basis of trusting other people's opinion. I am only interested in knowledge, knowing. Something you have rejected. That is what the scientific method has provided us.

You have rejected it and all evidence, data, and knowledge, and have chosen to put your faith in anecdotal bullshit and your own ignorant opinion.

It is good to finally hear you admit that you are not interested in anything but your own delusions.

who is us? the question is directly to you spergy larry. show me what scientific method you used used to isolate convid. you are still too retarded to understand that you only hold a belief

Us is the vast majority of scientists, philosophers and great thinkers since Sir Francis Bacon first outlined it as a rational logical way to solve problems and define reality back in the 16th century. (in fact you can go back to Egypt and Ancient Greece and China to find something very similar).

Critical thinking is the key component though, because without it you cannot use logic to come to conclusions.

This is where you fall down.

You find it impossible to excercise critical thinking. You do not have any respect for objectivity. Without verifiability, any test to prove whether an hypothesis is true or false is meaningless.

Your idea that one person doing a test is the only person who knows something and everyone else who trust the scientific method is merely beleiving and trusting the word of others, shows exactly how dense and naive you really are.

It is in the repeated testing and collection of masses of data from testing again and again the hypothesis, that true knowledge lies.

You are talking about your own subjective emotions when you insist that people answer your question. It has nothing to do with knowledge or knowing anything.

You have admitted yourself that you are not interested in knowledge only belief. That is why you are even trying to prescribe what people should answer in order to avoid changing your BELIEF.


Putting it simply -

The scientific method allows scientific data to be replicated and confirmed in many instances, under different circumstances, and by a variety of researchers. Through replication of experiments, experts can reduce errors and broaden the applicability of theories. It also allows theories to be tested and validated instead of simply being conjectures that could never be verified or falsified. All of this allows experts to gain a stronger understanding of how the virus works.

That is how we know Covid can live outside of the body.

Not because of the word of others but because the hypothesis that suggested such a thing was true has been tested and verified thousands of times by experts in controlled conditions with neutral bystanders and checks and balances all across the world.

That is knowledge or knowing something, whereas what you are asking us all to do is pretend that none of those experiments have been done or that every person doing so is telling lies. You are askng us all to make a leap of faith and believe something for which you can not present even one shred of evidence. You can not even present the kind of stupid anecdotal evidence you are asking us all to pull out of our arses.

Now is the time to show your hand.

Unless of course you were bluffing all along?

[TIC]

There are no fallacies in my argument.

It is a pretty simple and irrefutable fact that there is no such thing as scientific proof. All we have are the best possible theories that can be constructed to explain reality.

These theories are tested again and again to prove that they are the closest we can get to 'knowimg' anything. True knowledge. Truth.

Being an immature naive child you have rejected this idea of knowing anything and would rather believe in your own fictional made up stories about an individual with no scientific expertise carrying out a one off test that will back up your fairy tale belief.

Like Manuel, you know nothing, and don't even have the excuse of English not being your first language.

all you bring to the table are fallacies. talking about so called experts is a fallacy because it is not your proving your belief true. theories are just ideas. an idea is a belief. unlike water to ice that you can prove to be true. so tell me how you tested again & again to isolate convid to prove your hypothesis is true. & it's knowing with a n not m spergy. you just hold a belief that you can't prove to be true & i am not interested in your beliefs spastic

Ha! Bless

Your rejection of the idea of both the existence of experts and evidence is about as fallacious as one could get.

Science exists because the theory that best explains reality is repeatedly tested by experts. These theories are not just ideas, they are stringently tested models based on the best available knowledge. They are far closer to knowing than anything else in existence.

It is not my hypothesis. I have not formulated the question or carried out the hundreds of studies needed to test it. A single test would prove nothing without the large scale studies that proved their effectivness.

I have taken many PCR and LFT tests over the last 18 months and they all came back as negative until I developed symptoms of covid and the surprise, surprise both the lft and pcr came back as positive.

That is about as close to knowing as I am ever going to get.

You are are talking about fairy tales as you do not understand science or philosophical concepts at all.

i never denied the existence of experts spergy. just that trusting what you have been told by others is not you proving those claims to be true. evidence is not you proving your belief to be true. it's just you providing stories that support your bias. explanations are not you proving your belief to be true. models are not reality. tell me how you tested your theory. you are right that you haven't done shit. you have just put your faith & trust in others. that is a belief spastic. please show me the science you have complete to prove your belief is true & a reality. you don't know & are just happy to believe. that is your right. but that is all it is, just a belief & faith in what someone else has said & i am not interested in your belief

Yes you have denied the existence of experts repeatedly for two years now.

Calling hundreds of thousands of clinicians, scientists, and medics from all over the world who all agree that covid 19 is a virus that can exist outside of the body and be passed on by droplets and aerosols, "so called experts" and claiming that Covid 19 is "convid" again and again, demonstrates quite conclusively your denial of experts.

There is no need to carry out tests or experiments in person unless like you, one doesn't believe in experts, data and evidence.

You can't even express yourself clearly in English. When you say things like

"Evidence is not you proving your belief to be true"

and

"Explanations are not you proving your belief to be true"

Then you can't expect to be taken seriously.

The fallacy you have been repeatedly using with your flawed immature logic is a variant of the appeal to perfection fallacy, a false dichotomy that erroneously limits which options are available. A black and white type of thinking in which you are rejecting the commonly accepted scientific method because it can never be perfect.

It matters not to you that it is the best possible option for knowing something. In fact you are claiming that personal anecdotal evidence, casual, non systematic, uncorroborated claims are the only thing you will accept as 'knowing' something.

That is fallacious bullshit of the lowest order.

you have admitted that you are influenced by others & are happy to just believe rather than prove what has been offered to you to be true. you have admitted that you don't know & only trust others. that is a belief. i'm not interested in your belief. the question has always been how do you know covid is a virus caught from outside the body, through the air or off surfaces. your only answer should be i don't know it to be true but i believe. or you would prove to me how you know that claim is true & you still can't. i'm not interested in what you believe

So now you are telling me what my answer to your question should be?

Ha!

I am not here to blow smoke up your arse or reinforce your deluded fairy tale beliefs.

And no unlike you I am not happy to believe on the basis of trusting other people's opinion. I am only interested in knowledge, knowing. Something you have rejected. That is what the scientific method has provided us.

You have rejected it and all evidence, data, and knowledge, and have chosen to put your faith in anecdotal bullshit and your own ignorant opinion.

It is good to finally hear you admit that you are not interested in anything but your own delusions.

who is us? the question is directly to you spergy larry. show me what scientific method you used used to isolate convid. you are still too retarded to understand that you only hold a belief

Us is the vast majority of scientists, philosophers and great thinkers since Sir Francis Bacon first outlined it as a rational logical way to solve problems and define reality back in the 16th century. (in fact you can go back to Egypt and Ancient Greece and China to find something very similar).

Critical thinking is the key component though, because without it you cannot use logic to come to conclusions.

This is where you fall down.

You find it impossible to excercise critical thinking. You do not have any respect for objectivity. Without verifiability, any test to prove whether an hypothesis is true or false is meaningless.

Your idea that one person doing a test is the only person who knows something and everyone else who trust the scientific method is merely beleiving and trusting the word of others, shows exactly how dense and naive you really are.

It is in the repeated testing and collection of masses of data from testing again and again the hypothesis, that true knowledge lies.

You are talking about your own subjective emotions when you insist that people answer your question. It has nothing to do with knowledge or knowing anything.

You have admitted yourself that you are not interested in knowledge only belief. That is why you are even trying to prescribe what people should answer in order to avoid changing your BELIEF.


Putting it simply -

The scientific method allows scientific data to be replicated and confirmed in many instances, under different circumstances, and by a variety of researchers. Through replication of experiments, experts can reduce errors and broaden the applicability of theories. It also allows theories to be tested and validated instead of simply being conjectures that could never be verified or falsified. All of this allows experts to gain a stronger understanding of how the virus works.

That is how we know Covid can live outside of the body.

Not because of the word of others but because the hypothesis that suggested such a thing was true has been tested and verified thousands of times by experts in controlled conditions with neutral bystanders and checks and balances all across the world.

That is knowledge or knowing something, whereas what you are asking us all to do is pretend that none of those experiments have been done or that every person doing so is telling lies. You are askng us all to make a leap of faith and believe something for which you can not present even one shred of evidence. You can not even present the kind of stupid anecdotal evidence you are asking us all to pull out of our arses.

Now is the time to show your hand.

Unless of course you were bluffing all along?

us isn't you larry. you made claims about my reality & have been asked to prove those claims to be true & you haven't been able to. you spelt exercise & believing wrong as well spastic. you have been asked to provided your testing that proves your hypothesis is correct & haven't been able to. you haven't done anything, only put your faith, trust in others & chosen to believe. if you know something is true, then you have verified it yourself & that is knowing. you haven't, as you have admitted, so you only hold a belief. show me the scientific method you used & the experiments you have completed to prove your belief in what you were told. who is we larry? i am asking you how you know convid is real & what you have done to prove that claim. tell me how you tested that hypothesis. you don't have knowledge you only have beliefs. i'm asking you to provide details on the experiments you have completed to verify the claims. i am not saying every person is lying, i am asking them to prove their claims are true & not just a belief. i have said over & over that anyone can believe what they want. i am not interested in beliefs. keep believing because you obviously can't prove your belief is true