Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Preme View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post

I think beating De La Hoya at 154 is a bigger win than Pacquaio beating Marquez by controversial decision, especially when you factor in the amount of damage Pacquaio absorbed.

And hatton was the undisiputed, undefeated junior welterweight champ and Floyd simply annihilated him.

Pacquiao won by the skin of his teeth, at least three quarters of people here think he lost. There were several times he looked out on his feet.

there's no comparison,Floyd isa different league altogether.
that and the fact floyd has been at that weight and won a belt there.

pac vs floyd at that weight? floyd would KO him no question.
have you ever seen floyd get hit flush? none right? anybody that could punch gets a 50/50 chance. how could you be so sure floyd ko's him? i wish manny and floyd were in the same division coz they will surely make the fight happen. now we will see who will shut up.

Ahhaahahahah who is this clown. THat has to be one of the stupidest posts I've ever read with regards boxing on this forum. So, since Floyd has never been hit flush(though he has), but let's say he had been hit, "none right?" Therefore anyone who can punch has a 50/50 chance....Oh god, that's too good. So he's never fought anyone who could punch, I guess By your rationale if he'd fought more than 2 or 3 he'd likely have lost huh?. Really, fukin priceless how STUPID some of these Pacboys are. USE YOUR EYES, WATCH THE TWO MEN FIGHT. There's absolutely no possible way Pacquiao is a better pound for pound fighter than Mayweather. It's ridiculous to suggest otherwise if you are truly objective. Hella drunk, sorry bout the rant but I hate reading garbasge like this. Those who are more articulate with their feeble arguement's than this goof, are still just as pathetic in my eyes for claiming to really feel Pacquiao is better.