Pacman v Hamed

[Majesty]

Why? I'm a fan of Hamed..... He was really good. Luisito Espinosa would not have a chance against him but against Pacquaio he was simply inferior in defense and offense. I know you know why...do I need to explain? I suggest you watch his fights.

Hamed was a good counterpuncher and i've seen him having a pretty solid defense, he relied on his reflexes 99 percent of the time but i was pretty sure his defense was pretty good since he started his career as they called a "fancy dan with knockout power" He looked pretty good defensively, he was knocked down by Alicea but he looked pretty good dodging punches in that fight. You think Pacquiao has a better defense then Hamed did? How so?

Remember a decent Southpaw named Kevin Kelley ?? he had Naz on the canvas 3 times, now just imagine Pacquiao in Kelley's shoes Majesty. Just raising this question to give you something to think about, Naz had terrible balance and he could be countered. And Pacquiao is an underrated counter puncher he even countered a very good counter puncher like Marquez in there 2nd fight.

I remember Kevin Kelley, what was the result of that fight? Pacquiao would slug with him and it would be a battle of who landed first. But Hamed was a good counterpuncher, but why is mostly only the Kevin Kelley fight and the Barerra fight brought up? Hamed has looked a lot better then in those fights.

Aren't we considering they both are at their best? If we are then we'd be looking more at the Robinson fight instead of the Kelley fight. Or are we not looking at Robinson because some people don't think he was classs?