Do you ever plan on posting on anything other than Pac or is he the only boxer you like??
Let me address the thread title.
If anything, it should be Hatton first, THEN Oscar.... if you go by size. However, seeing as to how Oscar is saying this is his last fight, I can see where the roach wants to throw his fighter in the ring with him right away. It'll mean $$$$$ for Pacquaio, which of course translates into $$$ for the roach. But is it in Manny's best interests? Hell no.
Aside from that, saying that "after DLH we'll take Hatton or PBF" sounds like the maniacal rantings of a money-hungry idiot, which is precisely the way I'm starting to view the roach.
Well I hate to tell you but it's been proven the other way a lot more often.
Most of those who give PAC no chance against Hoya said that PAC's punches will have no effect on the bigger Hoya. Let's say if those same punches that PAC landed on Diaz' head lands on Hoya's head, it will have no effect? Of course PAC will have a very difficult task of landing something clean on Hoya's head, let's just assume that he can land some and analyze if it will have no effect at all.
Last edited by XaduBoxer; 08-10-2008 at 10:48 PM.
Why are people giving Manny Pacquiao no chance ? i don't think people realize is that when Manny Pacquiao was fighting at the lower weight classes he was young at that wasn't nowhere near his natural weight.......
Manny Pacquiao is round about 145 pounds right ? and i seem to remember Steve Forbes who had been at Super Featherweight/Lightweight for majority of his career and was obviously not a natural Welterweight and had no punching power......
Giving Oscar De La Hoya a good argument and even busted up his face somewhat and remember no one gave Steve Forbes a hope in hell of making it 12 rounds with Oscar De La Hoya let alone giving him a good argument......
So i fail to see why Manny Pacquiao has no chance in this fight ?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks