Pac vs ODLH: Pac declines offer

[Spicoli]

30% is good for PBF since he was the challenger and Oscar was the champ at that time.

The belt had absolutely zero importance in that fight. That fight was about having the biggest star in the sport against the #1 PFP fighter in the world. The belt at 154 was meaningless. Most belts are meaningless. Oscar didn't get 70% against Floyd because he was a beltholder. He got 70% because he was the draw. That's why Oscar feels he deserves 70% against Pacquiao as well, because he would be the draw, not Manny.

I also considered belts meaningless but mind you, belts has some bearing in purse negotiations...

You conveniently omitted these factors. Can you give opposing thoughts on this?

"Since then Oscar is on a steady decline. Oscar got beaten by PBF and marked heavily by Forbes in a sleeper fight.

On the other hand PAC on steady rise, belt at 130, most exciting boxer, belt at 135, no. 1 P4P best boxer, etc. So IMO seriously PAC deserves 35 to 40 percent of the purse... "

Oscar is the draw, it's a fact and giving 60% or 65% to Oscar is a clear indication that he's the draw otherwise Oscar gets 50% or less...

.

Honestly,thats pretty Subjective for a quoted Pac set??And where do "Factors" and "IMO" meet up?

Oscar owns the traveling circus.....Pac is looking for a front row seat ticket.