
Originally Posted by
Fenster
That's rubbish.. it can be equally claimed Calzaghe wasn't 100% against Hopkins due to looking better against numerous opponents in the past - YET still BEAT Hopkins. Fact.
Hopkins looked better against Pavlik, than he did Calzaghe, because Pavlik is a much LESSER fighter than Calzaghe. Simple as.
No,not fact,almost all of Joes shots werent landing,biceps dont count for scoring.
And only 1 person hit the canvas
Hint
It wasnt Bernard
Bookmarks