Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
Array
Alright did not ask you how they looked i asked who had the best wins and to me that is Oscar and i think he should get some credit for it. Roy never had to step it up as much as Oscar did and Oscar had to do it alot. So dont you think but i can see your point still say Oscars higher.
As for Evander Holyfeild i say he is to cruiser what Roy is to Light heavy. It took alot to get Evander to make it Heavyweight he could of stayed at CW for alot more years but he would of not got the glory that he has. You say that Tyson was past it but Evander was older with a bad hart and still kicked the crap out of him and he was let me see 35 what was roy doing at 35 well let me see getting knocked the f*** out if i can remeber. Also the Lewis stomping him lets not forget that he was 37 and still with heart problems still has them i dont see how they could let him fight. Toney was weight drain to all hell when Roy fought him and Toney was not at his best not taking away form Roy just Toney had problems. Both him and Bernard were green and not prime so i kinda take that with a grain of salt neither was at his best and they never rematched so what ever. You bring up the close fight with Dwight but that was Evander 12 fight and we all saw what happen in the rematch he destroyed him so all i am saying why not Evander pound for pound he has done just as much but does not get the credit i think he should. I think you can poke holes through any mans career but i can say this Evander ducked no one i can not say the same for Roy and to me i think thats why i always like Evander better.
Array
Array
Oscar's record is very strong, but it is manufactured to look even better than it actually is, plus he never actually dominated someone who wasn't cannon fodder and lost the true main events in his career.
You can tear down anyone's careerwhen you have the blinkers on. Like Taeth said, you have to look at the chronology of things before start saying that Roy ducked people (not saying you did MR140, just a reference to the thread as a whole.)
Personally I believe Benn had a punchers chance, and like someone mentioned maybe get lucky 1/5 against him, but they were never on a collision course, Benn was well and truly finished after Mclellan, and if the older Benn had fought Roy it would have been a massacre.
Array
Which is what makes it so weird rofl.,
2 other people on here said they rewatched it aswell and actually had bernard by a point.
The fight was just so boring..but honestly.. it's worth a rewatch.
Fighters who don't get off like they want to in a fight or never get
in a rhythm or comfortable like Bernard clearly was the entire night, often times
wont dispute the decision if they lose...But he actually did pretty good dispite having
not perfected his craft yet.
During that time bernard was a "killer". He had a great body attack and would often times
stalk his opponent. He showed tremendous respect for Roys ability and did none of that in their fight. Obviously, Bernard is an entirely different fighter today.. which is why I never look at the Roy/Bhop fight as a huge win for Roy. If i beat on an infant today and he becomes a world champion in thirty years, does that make him a significant win for me?
Bhop was highly regarded and a great fighter at the time they fought, but he, imo, had no where near the knowledge of the game he has now. He's a much more dangerous adversary now and i actually have the fight alot closer after rewatching than I did before.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks