Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 121

Thread: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post

    If he is so much better at LW, and he must be aware of this, then why not come in at that weight. PBF was not never going to be significantly bigger than Hatton, regardless of whether Hatton came in at 140 or 145 (which is what I think he weighed in at), and the weight wouldn't have made any more than a marginal difference, one that would easily be offset by a "sharper, more explosive" Hatton. Of course extra training and discipline make a difference, but I'm sure Hatton wasn't spending his prefight training time drinking guiness and eating burgers. I highly doubt he let his training slip during the run up to fight the best fighter in the world, that, IMO, is a ridiculous assertion. Hatton and his team believed weighing in at 140 would've given him a better chance against PBF, then they would've done it as, because of the fact that Floyd is not even a natural 140lber, the weight discrepency would've been negligable.

    I'm not trying to be mean, but your argument makes little sense to me. PBF owns Hatton at whatever weight they fight at. Like others have mentioned, PBF would also be sharper and faster at 140, negative whatever supposed advantage you think Hatton would have.
    Thats fine bud ... so we have different points of view you keep talking about Floyd who is awesome ... but as I keep saying its about Hatton for me ..Im not disputing who would win as Ive said all along it would still be Floyd but Hatton would fight a better fight

    Look you aint changin my thinkin ... nor me yours so lets agree to disagree yeah ... then neither of us gets frustrated at going around in circles ok...

    I respect your opinion as a fellow poster & thank you for it..

    Of course I keep talking about Floyd, that is who Hatton was fighting. He is relevant because you claim he would have some kind of size advantage against Hatton if Hatton came in weighing 140, which is not true. I agree that if Hatton was fighting a Margarito this point would be moot, but he wasn't fighting a true welter.

    But whatever, I'll drop it, but honestly I still don't feel you've made a valid point and this board is all about debating these things.
    He made a totally valid point bro,Ricky is one of the most notorious undertrainers in the entire business.
    It probably goes similar,but Hatton makes it a way better fight then it was,if he had come in in better shape.
    Hatton's a great fighter,but he gives anybody whose stuck training him ulcers because of his lack of discipline
    If he had had to make a lower weight,he might have trained harder and made a better go of it.
    Floyd still probably beats him,but it wouldnt have been as one sided as it was

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post

    Thats fine bud ... so we have different points of view you keep talking about Floyd who is awesome ... but as I keep saying its about Hatton for me ..Im not disputing who would win as Ive said all along it would still be Floyd but Hatton would fight a better fight

    Look you aint changin my thinkin ... nor me yours so lets agree to disagree yeah ... then neither of us gets frustrated at going around in circles ok...

    I respect your opinion as a fellow poster & thank you for it..

    Of course I keep talking about Floyd, that is who Hatton was fighting. He is relevant because you claim he would have some kind of size advantage against Hatton if Hatton came in weighing 140, which is not true. I agree that if Hatton was fighting a Margarito this point would be moot, but he wasn't fighting a true welter.

    But whatever, I'll drop it, but honestly I still don't feel you've made a valid point and this board is all about debating these things.
    He made a totally valid point bro,Ricky is one of the most notorious undertrainers in the entire business.
    It probably goes similar,but Hatton makes it a way better fight then it was,if he had come in in better shape.
    Hatton's a great fighter,but he gives anybody whose stuck training him ulcers because of his lack of discipline
    If he had had to make a lower weight,he might have trained harder and made a better go of it.
    Floyd still probably beats him,but it wouldnt have been as one sided as it was
    Since when has Hatton been known as a "notorious undertrainer"? I've never heard anyone credible make that claim.

    He has a reputation for training like a demon, the knock on him is that he balloons up in weight between fights, but has always been renowned for his conditioning.

    If he was such a undedicated subject, how does he manage to drop from 170-180 lbs to 140 in time for his fights?
    Last edited by CFH; 11-26-2008 at 11:07 PM. Reason: spelling

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post

    Of course I keep talking about Floyd, that is who Hatton was fighting. He is relevant because you claim he would have some kind of size advantage against Hatton if Hatton came in weighing 140, which is not true. I agree that if Hatton was fighting a Margarito this point would be moot, but he wasn't fighting a true welter.

    But whatever, I'll drop it, but honestly I still don't feel you've made a valid point and this board is all about debating these things.
    He made a totally valid point bro,Ricky is one of the most notorious undertrainers in the entire business.
    It probably goes similar,but Hatton makes it a way better fight then it was,if he had come in in better shape.
    Hatton's a great fighter,but he gives anybody whose stuck training him ulcers because of his lack of discipline
    If he had had to make a lower weight,he might have trained harder and made a better go of it.
    Floyd still probably beats him,but it wouldnt have been as one sided as it was
    Since when has Hatton been known as a "notorious undertrainers"? I've never heard anyone credible make that claim.

    He has a reputation for training like a demon, the knock on him is that he balloons up in weight between fights, but has always been renowned for his conditioning.

    If he was such a undedicated subject, how does he manage to drop from 170-180 lbs to 140 in time for his fights?
    He's also notorious for Sauna Suiting
    Its going to catch him eventually,you could make a case that it caught him against Mayweather,but I think he still loses that fight

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LEEDS
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1157
    Cool Clicks

    Talking Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Bang on from ya TrainerMonkey thats all Im saying..

    Hidden Content
    A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4435
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post

    Thats fine bud ... so we have different points of view you keep talking about Floyd who is awesome ... but as I keep saying its about Hatton for me ..Im not disputing who would win as Ive said all along it would still be Floyd but Hatton would fight a better fight

    Look you aint changin my thinkin ... nor me yours so lets agree to disagree yeah ... then neither of us gets frustrated at going around in circles ok...

    I respect your opinion as a fellow poster & thank you for it..

    Of course I keep talking about Floyd, that is who Hatton was fighting. He is relevant because you claim he would have some kind of size advantage against Hatton if Hatton came in weighing 140, which is not true. I agree that if Hatton was fighting a Margarito this point would be moot, but he wasn't fighting a true welter.

    But whatever, I'll drop it, but honestly I still don't feel you've made a valid point and this board is all about debating these things.
    He made a totally valid point bro,Ricky is one of the most notorious undertrainers in the entire business.
    It probably goes similar,but Hatton makes it a way better fight then it was,if he had come in in better shape.
    Hatton's a great fighter,but he gives anybody whose stuck training him ulcers because of his lack of discipline
    If he had had to make a lower weight,he might have trained harder and made a better go of it.
    Floyd still probably beats him,but it wouldnt have been as one sided as it was
    I'm pretty sure I remember the Hatton camp saying Ricky was training the hardest he ever had for the Mayweather fight. Mayweather is a gym rat, he is ALWAYS training, nobody trains harder than PBF fight coming up or not he is always in peak shape. Hatton getting into shape for 140 would require him to do extra cardio and wath his diet more, I don't see how either of those things would give him the extra skills to have anymore success against PBF than he did at 147.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LEEDS
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1157
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post

    Of course I keep talking about Floyd, that is who Hatton was fighting. He is relevant because you claim he would have some kind of size advantage against Hatton if Hatton came in weighing 140, which is not true. I agree that if Hatton was fighting a Margarito this point would be moot, but he wasn't fighting a true welter.

    But whatever, I'll drop it, but honestly I still don't feel you've made a valid point and this board is all about debating these things.
    He made a totally valid point bro,Ricky is one of the most notorious undertrainers in the entire business.
    It probably goes similar,but Hatton makes it a way better fight then it was,if he had come in in better shape.
    Hatton's a great fighter,but he gives anybody whose stuck training him ulcers because of his lack of discipline
    If he had had to make a lower weight,he might have trained harder and made a better go of it.
    Floyd still probably beats him,but it wouldnt have been as one sided as it was
    I'm pretty sure I remember the Hatton camp saying Ricky was training the hardest he ever had for the Mayweather fight. Mayweather is a gym rat, he is ALWAYS training, nobody trains harder than PBF fight coming up or not he is always in peak shape. Hatton getting into shape for 140 would require him to do extra cardio and wath his diet more, I don't see how either of those things would give him the extra skills to have anymore success against PBF than he did at 147.
    Who said anything about skills bud ... & the Hatton camp will always say the best for there fighter...but the extra put in gives him more energy more discipline, more explosive power & more speed...not to mention what it does mentally when sacrificing so much, it makes ya meaner, more aggressive ... nothing to do with would he win or not Im bored of saying I dont think he would, but for the above reasons Im saying Hatton fights as a better fighter than he does at welter against anybody

    Hidden Content
    A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4435
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    He made a totally valid point bro,Ricky is one of the most notorious undertrainers in the entire business.
    It probably goes similar,but Hatton makes it a way better fight then it was,if he had come in in better shape.
    Hatton's a great fighter,but he gives anybody whose stuck training him ulcers because of his lack of discipline
    If he had had to make a lower weight,he might have trained harder and made a better go of it.
    Floyd still probably beats him,but it wouldnt have been as one sided as it was
    I'm pretty sure I remember the Hatton camp saying Ricky was training the hardest he ever had for the Mayweather fight. Mayweather is a gym rat, he is ALWAYS training, nobody trains harder than PBF fight coming up or not he is always in peak shape. Hatton getting into shape for 140 would require him to do extra cardio and wath his diet more, I don't see how either of those things would give him the extra skills to have anymore success against PBF than he did at 147.
    Who said anything about skills bud ... & the Hatton camp will always say the best for there fighter...but the extra put in gives him more energy more discipline, more explosive power & more speed...not to mention what it does mentally when sacrificing so much, it makes ya meaner, more aggressive ... nothing to do with would he win or not Im bored of saying I dont think he would, but for the above reasons Im saying Hatton fights as a better fighter than he does at welter against anybody
    Are you saying he fought Mayweather and Collazo less aggressively and more slowly than his fights at 140?
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LEEDS
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1157
    Cool Clicks

    Talking Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post

    I'm pretty sure I remember the Hatton camp saying Ricky was training the hardest he ever had for the Mayweather fight. Mayweather is a gym rat, he is ALWAYS training, nobody trains harder than PBF fight coming up or not he is always in peak shape. Hatton getting into shape for 140 would require him to do extra cardio and wath his diet more, I don't see how either of those things would give him the extra skills to have anymore success against PBF than he did at 147.
    Who said anything about skills bud ... & the Hatton camp will always say the best for there fighter...but the extra put in gives him more energy more discipline, more explosive power & more speed...not to mention what it does mentally when sacrificing so much, it makes ya meaner, more aggressive ... nothing to do with would he win or not Im bored of saying I dont think he would, but for the above reasons Im saying Hatton fights as a better fighter than he does at welter against anybody
    Are you saying he fought Mayweather and Collazo less aggressively and more slowly than his fights at 140?
    No Im saying the extra he has to give to make lite welter changes him all around & I really believe it does ... & I really believe its a mental thing, in that having to discipline himself that much more changes him ... as well as the fitness benefits obviously...he has to put in extra at lw that gives him a different toughness mentally & physically, which I believe gives a better fighter in bringing out the best in him thats all..

    Hidden Content
    A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4435
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post

    Who said anything about skills bud ... & the Hatton camp will always say the best for there fighter...but the extra put in gives him more energy more discipline, more explosive power & more speed...not to mention what it does mentally when sacrificing so much, it makes ya meaner, more aggressive ... nothing to do with would he win or not Im bored of saying I dont think he would, but for the above reasons Im saying Hatton fights as a better fighter than he does at welter against anybody
    Are you saying he fought Mayweather and Collazo less aggressively and more slowly than his fights at 140?
    No Im saying the extra he has to give to make lite welter changes him all around & I really believe it does ... & I really believe its a mental thing, in that having to discipline himself that much more changes him ... as well as the fitness benefits obviously...he has to put in extra at lw that gives him a different toughness mentally & physically, which I believe gives a better fighter in bringing out the best in him thats all..
    So why does that not apply to Mayweather?
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LEEDS
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1157
    Cool Clicks

    Talking Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post

    Are you saying he fought Mayweather and Collazo less aggressively and more slowly than his fights at 140?
    No Im saying the extra he has to give to make lite welter changes him all around & I really believe it does ... & I really believe its a mental thing, in that having to discipline himself that much more changes him ... as well as the fitness benefits obviously...he has to put in extra at lw that gives him a different toughness mentally & physically, which I believe gives a better fighter in bringing out the best in him thats all..
    So why does that not apply to Mayweather?
    Eh ... dont get ya bud I never said it wouldnt ... so if thats so Floyd fights a better fight then yes ... so then Ricky does too .. so maybe we get the same result but a better fight..

    Hidden Content
    A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post

    I'm pretty sure I remember the Hatton camp saying Ricky was training the hardest he ever had for the Mayweather fight. Mayweather is a gym rat, he is ALWAYS training, nobody trains harder than PBF fight coming up or not he is always in peak shape. Hatton getting into shape for 140 would require him to do extra cardio and wath his diet more, I don't see how either of those things would give him the extra skills to have anymore success against PBF than he did at 147.
    Who said anything about skills bud ... & the Hatton camp will always say the best for there fighter...but the extra put in gives him more energy more discipline, more explosive power & more speed...not to mention what it does mentally when sacrificing so much, it makes ya meaner, more aggressive ... nothing to do with would he win or not Im bored of saying I dont think he would, but for the above reasons Im saying Hatton fights as a better fighter than he does at welter against anybody
    Are you saying he fought Mayweather and Collazo less aggressively and more slowly than his fights at 140?
    I dont think anyone is saying he would have beaten Mayweather,but he would have had a much better shot if he had been tighter and in better shape is more what both of us are saying.
    I still think Floyd would end up being too slick for Hatton's style,but he would have had a better shot at it lighter

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LEEDS
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1157
    Cool Clicks

    Talking Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post

    Who said anything about skills bud ... & the Hatton camp will always say the best for there fighter...but the extra put in gives him more energy more discipline, more explosive power & more speed...not to mention what it does mentally when sacrificing so much, it makes ya meaner, more aggressive ... nothing to do with would he win or not Im bored of saying I dont think he would, but for the above reasons Im saying Hatton fights as a better fighter than he does at welter against anybody
    Are you saying he fought Mayweather and Collazo less aggressively and more slowly than his fights at 140?
    I dont think anyone is saying he would have beaten Mayweather,but he would have had a much better shot if he had been tighter and in better shape is more what both of us are saying.
    I still think Floyd would end up being too slick for Hatton's style,but he would have had a better shot at it lighter

    Spot on Bro .. simple as that


    Hidden Content
    A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post

    Are you saying he fought Mayweather and Collazo less aggressively and more slowly than his fights at 140?
    I dont think anyone is saying he would have beaten Mayweather,but he would have had a much better shot if he had been tighter and in better shape is more what both of us are saying.
    I still think Floyd would end up being too slick for Hatton's style,but he would have had a better shot at it lighter

    Spot on Bro .. simple as that


    But the weight the fight took place at has nothing to do with it. You're essentially saying that Hatton is not professional enough to come into the biggest fight of his career in the best possible condition, but I have never seen any evidence of this at all nor have I ever read anything from a credible source suggesting it.

    Hatton was in the best possible shape for the Mayweather fight, in fact he weighed in well below the 147 limit with the stated goal of keeping that sharpness and that hunger.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4435
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post

    Are you saying he fought Mayweather and Collazo less aggressively and more slowly than his fights at 140?
    I dont think anyone is saying he would have beaten Mayweather,but he would have had a much better shot if he had been tighter and in better shape is more what both of us are saying.
    I still think Floyd would end up being too slick for Hatton's style,but he would have had a better shot at it lighter
    Spot on Bro .. simple as that
    So you are saying he would have won more rounds? Or maybe see the final bell? Or maybe he had more of a punchers chance? If you are not saying he would win, then maybe I missed the original point of this topic as written by beanflicker:

    Quote Originally Posted by beanflicker
    Apart from Joe Cortez, the biggest excuse for his loss was the weight they fought at. Both guys are the same height, Ricky started his career (and stayed) at 140, Floyd starts his career at 130. Ricky is known as the bigger fighter, a guy who balloons up between fights and kills himself to make weight.

    So how would the fight have been any different if both men had to weight in at 140? People say Ricky isn't a WW. True, but neither is Mayweather. Mayweather is just a guy fighting in weight classes he has no business in because he's going where the money is.

    So how would have 140 made the fight different? You'd think weighting at 147 would benefit Ricky more, because he's the guy who kills himself making weight. Would extra hours spent in the sauna cutting weight make Ricky better? Would making 140 be to PBF's detriment? Why? He's in shape 24/7, 365 and never has an issue making weight.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,155
    Mentioned
    439 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    140,147.....The fact that Hatton drinks like a fish in the off time and melts back down to fit shape by fight time is pretty amazing and one would think pretty taxing physically.Whatever the weight,Hatton could not compensate for the athleticism of Mayweather.Hattons 'fast' is Mayweathers 'lightspeed'.............And I picked Hatton

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-05-2008, 09:18 AM
  2. WHY IS WEIGHT NO LONGER AN ISSUE AT 200lbs?
    By shalamigri in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-21-2005, 05:53 PM
  3. Why is weight no longer an issue after 200lbs?
    By shalamigri in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-21-2005, 02:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing