Mumbai

[CGM]

Sabbra and Shatilla happened in the early eighties,the Jewish brigades surrounded the refugee camps,and the Lebanese CHRISTIAN MILITIA walked in and shot every woman child and elderly person they could find.
Oklahoma City and Atlanta happened in the 90's

Yes, I remember the massacres in the Palestine camps in the 80s. Wrong yes. But I wouldn't say they were done in the name of christianity. Rather they were an extreme and over the top reaction to terrorism, because a lot of the terrorists were supoosedly based in the camps. And things got out of hand. There was also a civil war going on at the time.

No,it was a cold blooded massacre,and it was religous in nature,the Palestinian combatants had allready left the camp under Jewish supervision.
The "terrorists"(ha ha) werent there,and the Jews had allready confirmed that,they supervised the removal

point taken, that was over 30 years ago. End of this part of the thread.

[Trainer Monkey]

Yes, I remember the massacres in the Palestine camps in the 80s. Wrong yes. But I wouldn't say they were done in the name of christianity. Rather they were an extreme and over the top reaction to terrorism, because a lot of the terrorists were supoosedly based in the camps. And things got out of hand. There was also a civil war going on at the time.

No,it was a cold blooded massacre,and it was religous in nature,the Palestinian combatants had allready left the camp under Jewish supervision.
The "terrorists"(ha ha) werent there,and the Jews had allready confirmed that,they supervised the removal

point taken, that was over 30 years ago. End of this part of the thread.

27 but who's counting

Christian terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wack jobs arent exclusive to any religion

[Andre]

They are not Christians none of them are.
They use the name wrongly and they all have zero spiritual growth.

If they werereal Christians they would be shooting food and medical help at people not bombs.

Both sides use the name.
To use is the dead opposite of give.

This means both sides are anti the correct way.
Anti God and Anti Christ.

[Trainer Monkey]

They are not Christians none of them are.
They use the name wrongly and they all have zero spiritual growth.

If they werereal Christians they would be shooting food and medical help at people not bombs.

Both sides use the name.
To use is the dead opposite of give.

This means both sides are anti the correct way.
Anti God and Anti Christ.

My point being though, neither side has exclusivity rights to the "dangerous religious heretic" moniker.
And every time we try to make it that ,"Its just their evil religion" we drift further and further away from mutual understanding, and legitimate peace

[Youngblood]

They are not Christians none of them are.
They use the name wrongly and they all have zero spiritual growth.

If they werereal Christians they would be shooting food and medical help at people not bombs.

Both sides use the name.
To use is the dead opposite of give.

This means both sides are anti the correct way.
Anti God and Anti Christ.

My point being though, neither side has exclusivity rights to the "dangerous religious heretic" moniker.
And every time we try to make it that ,"Its just their evil religion" we drift further and further away from mutual understanding, and legitimate peace

Legitimate peace is not in our nature. C`mon now...it is a nice ideal, but hardly realistic. Our primitive animal instincts and tendancies won`t allow it. We are on a boxing forum...why is that. All about 2 people trying to hurt the other and show dominance.

Managing our instincts may be about as close to it as we come, and I suggest that management in and of itself is shown and helps explain the birth of religion.

We will always have violent tendancies. They will come in many shades of gray, and under many names. But overall, it is nature. Ugly sometimes, yes. Hard to understand, certainly. Part of who and what we are as a species, most definately.

[Trainer Monkey]

They are not Christians none of them are.
They use the name wrongly and they all have zero spiritual growth.

If they werereal Christians they would be shooting food and medical help at people not bombs.

Both sides use the name.
To use is the dead opposite of give.

This means both sides are anti the correct way.
Anti God and Anti Christ.

My point being though, neither side has exclusivity rights to the "dangerous religious heretic" moniker.
And every time we try to make it that ,"Its just their evil religion" we drift further and further away from mutual understanding, and legitimate peace

Legitimate peace is not in our nature. C`mon now...it is a nice ideal, but hardly realistic. Our primitive animal instincts and tendancies won`t allow it. We are on a boxing forum...why is that. All about 2 people trying to hurt the other and show dominance.

Managing our instincts may be about as close to it as we come, and I suggest that management in and of itself is shown and helps explain the birth of religion.

We will always have violent tendancies. They will come in many shades of gray, and under many names. But overall, it is nature. Ugly sometimes, yes. Hard to understand, certainly. Part of who and what we are as a species, most definately.

Dont buy it,it reaks of,"Cant win,dont try"
I cant tell you the last time I slugged somebody outside of the ring,and I have a very hot temper.
I just channel it, rather then act on it