A paradox about p4p rankings

[CGM]

To be honest Bilbo, I don't disagree with you, and I don't have anything better to offer. I'm just pointing out what I consider to be a flaw in the concept.

Like I said, it will be interesting to see how Ring Magazine handles it. Will they rank PAC as a welterweight, and will they rank him as the #1 welterweight, assuming he still has his p4p #1 status. Same question applies to JWW, seeing as how it looks like he will fight Hatton.

So how do you see it? How do you think Ring magazine will/should rank PAC?

Me, I do not think Ring will rank him #1 p4p without being #1 in a particular division.

they will not rank him on welter and jr. welter... they have him on lightweight... Pac defies weight classes that makes him special..

OK I guessed wrong. They have him at #2 lightweight, behind Marquez and Campbell, and #5 Welterweight, and #1 pfp. As of Dec 14. Go figure.

[antimoron]

To be honest Bilbo, I don't disagree with you, and I don't have anything better to offer. I'm just pointing out what I consider to be a flaw in the concept.

Like I said, it will be interesting to see how Ring Magazine handles it. Will they rank PAC as a welterweight, and will they rank him as the #1 welterweight, assuming he still has his p4p #1 status. Same question applies to JWW, seeing as how it looks like he will fight Hatton.

So how do you see it? How do you think Ring magazine will/should rank PAC?

Me, I do not think Ring will rank him #1 p4p without being #1 in a particular division.

they will not rank him on welter and jr. welter... they have him on lightweight... Pac defies weight classes that makes him special..

OK I guessed wrong. They have him at #2 lightweight, behind Marquez and Campbell, and #5 Welterweight, and #1 pfp. As of Dec 14. Go figure.

ok i saw it.. man that welter rank is too much... #5? RING MAG? got to talk to doug f. about it..