Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 134

Thread: Boxrec RULES!!!!

Share/Bookmark

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4168
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post

    My guess (it's only a guess or else ask BoxRec yourselves) is BoxRec's computerized ranking system is programmed to give more points to the boxer's ranking in P4P category and also more points for fights in higher weight division. Also more points if the boxer fought highly ranked boxers which is very obvious... I guess, currently PAC can be ranked at 135 or 140 or 147 just like what BoxRec, Fightnews and Ring Mag did...

    That's my guess...

    This is why I didn't want to get into this, you're just talking and not making a point.

    I have evidence that back my claim. We can both agree that PAC has not fought at 140.

    You have no evidence to prove that PAC should be ranked at 140, it is YOUR responsibility to provide evidence to justify your case. Until you have a valid reason to put PAC ahead of Hatton at 140 go to your room and let the grown-ups talk.

    Yes it's a fact that PAC has not fought at 140 but it's also a fact that he already fought at 147.

    For example, if PAC fought and annihilated the man at 147 then it's also a given that PAC is expected to annihilate the man at 140. Just think it that way...
    Bull sh!t Floyd originally jumped 140 cause Kostya was there . He won at 147 and never got rated by anyone at 140 .

    Its why allot of people are knockers of him and think he picked his way through and aimed at his marks.

    Just cause he fought at the weight twice but then beat others at 147 doesnt mean the points from his 147 stint should be also added to the 140 should they?
    If they should in your mind ;whats the difference between that and what your supporting in the above posts against Killersheeps true valid point against that system?

    Surley you think it is a crap system really down deep don't you?
    Last edited by Andre; 12-28-2008 at 01:05 AM.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Nevada changes rules
    By Taeth in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 12-22-2008, 05:51 PM
  2. Now What Now What Pavlik Rules!!!!
    By huntin_itai in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-20-2007, 07:06 AM
  3. WHICH RULES DO U PREFER?
    By SalTheButcher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-09-2007, 01:25 PM
  4. Rules for us Ladies...
    By emma in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-30-2006, 12:42 AM
  5. Hatton vs PBF MMA rules
    By MikeTysonKnockOut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-19-2006, 03:07 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing