Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 78

Thread: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1443
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    It should be 50/50. Hatton is the bigger draw and will pull in more PPV buys, but Pac is the more accomplished boxer. Pac won't get more money fighting someone else. Hatton could prob get the same money fighting Oscar at Wembley...even after what happened on Dec 6th.


    If Ricky takes less he's stupid. I honestly can't see a way in which he wins this fight and he won't be in a good position to bargain if he continues to fight on after this one.

  2. #2
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    I'm in favor for PAC having the lion's share of the purse split, maybe not less than 55% due to these reasons:
    - PAC the no. 1 P4P boxer
    - PAC the "hottest" boxer right now
    - PAC the early betting favorite against Hatton
    - Hatton got only 30% share in the PBF fight (from what I've read)
    - PAC got only 35% share in the Hoya fight
    - PAC the no. 1 boxer at 140 (according to BoxRec )
    - PAC has huge fanbase (maybe a very close second to Hatton's)
    .

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    I'm in favor for PAC having the lion's share of the purse split, maybe not less than 55% due to these reasons:
    - PAC the no. 1 P4P boxer
    - PAC the "hottest" boxer right now
    - PAC the early betting favorite against Hatton
    - Hatton got only 30% share in the PBF fight (from what I've read)
    - PAC got only 35% share in the Hoya fight
    - PAC the no. 1 boxer at 140 (according to BoxRec )
    - PAC has huge fanbase (maybe a very close second to Hatton's)
    .
    man, you've got to stop this. as a pac fan, this gets annoying!
    "speed is the essence of war"
    sun tzu-art of war

  4. #4
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    I'm in favor for PAC having the lion's share of the purse split, maybe not less than 55% due to these reasons:
    - PAC the no. 1 P4P boxer
    - PAC the "hottest" boxer right now
    - PAC the early betting favorite against Hatton
    - Hatton got only 30% share in the PBF fight (from what I've read)
    - PAC got only 35% share in the Hoya fight
    - PAC the no. 1 boxer at 140 (according to BoxRec )
    - PAC has huge fanbase (maybe a very close second to Hatton's)
    .
    man, you've got to stop this. as a pac fan, this gets annoying!
    I'm just presenting the FACTS pare that might be considered in the negotiating table...

    But I think all is well now with both boxers receiving 50% on everything including the UK PPV revenues...
    .
    Last edited by XaduBoxer; 01-15-2009 at 12:48 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    644
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1175
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    At the end of the day, credible arguments can be made on both sides about who deserves the greater share of the purse. 60-40 with the winner taking the bigger share of the purse seems like the best decision to me. I think all fights should come with with a bonus for the winner of the fight.

    140 isn't the division that it used to be. Hatton will struggle to find a fight with a third as much limelight as this fight will get. The only one I could think of is Hatton against Witter and 1)Hatton isn't going to fight Witter and 2) that fight would only be as big of a draw as a Hatton vs. Pac fight in the UK. In the States average fight fan probably doesn't even know who Witter is. And throw in the other names at 140 like Bradley, Holt, Ngoudjo and you won't find very much anticipation among your average boxing fan for a fight against Hatton. Pac has alot more options. Now if Hatton decided to move up to 147 than were talking a whole new ballgame.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    I'm in favor for PAC having the lion's share of the purse split, maybe not less than 55% due to these reasons:
    - PAC the no. 1 P4P boxer
    - PAC the "hottest" boxer right now
    - PAC the early betting favorite against Hatton
    - Hatton got only 30% share in the PBF fight (from what I've read)
    - PAC got only 35% share in the Hoya fight
    - PAC the no. 1 boxer at 140 (according to BoxRec )
    - PAC has huge fanbase (maybe a very close second to Hatton's)
    .
    man, you've got to stop this. as a pac fan, this gets annoying!
    I'm just presenting the FACTS pare that might be considered in the negotiating table...

    But I think all is well now with both boxers receiving 50% on everything including the UK PPV revenues...
    .
    we all know that. but come on. there are still a lot of people here who doesnt think of pac as a ppv draw. thats how people are. we all know pac is the bigger draw here base on what he has accomplished this past year. 3 fights in one year. 2 for the belt, one for recognition. everybody doubted him yet he accomplished what we had to do. if anything, arum is the one who gets the blame for this mess. regardless of what happens, promoters get paid. the dont have to get punched in the head to earn their living. what do they care?
    "speed is the essence of war"
    sun tzu-art of war

  7. #7
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post

    man, you've got to stop this. as a pac fan, this gets annoying!
    I'm just presenting the FACTS pare that might be considered in the negotiating table...

    But I think all is well now with both boxers receiving 50% on everything including the UK PPV revenues...
    .
    we all know that. but come on. there are still a lot of people here who doesnt think of pac as a ppv draw. thats how people are. we all know pac is the bigger draw here base on what he has accomplished this past year. 3 fights in one year. 2 for the belt, one for recognition. everybody doubted him yet he accomplished what we had to do. if anything, arum is the one who gets the blame for this mess. regardless of what happens, promoters get paid. the dont have to get punched in the head to earn their living. what do they care?
    Promoters are pimps... Boxers are whores... Fans, the customers??
    .

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1421
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a event Share Against Hatton?

    I think 60-40 Pac is about right to be honest Pac is now the guy everyone is talking about, the guy who just made Dela Hoya the darling of HBO look like an old man, hes the hot ticket, Hatton on the other hand just brings the British PPV, i mean he does make the fight much more appealing and potentially is the biggest PPV event in volving Pac other than Mayweather, so Hatton does bring something, but Hatton v Lazcano wasnt even deemed a big enough fight to be aired free on HBO, I think Hatton has done very very well getting 50/50, but they are going to make huge amounts and it makes sense for Pac to take 50/50 rather than ask for 60-40 and the fight falling through which like i said i think he dererves as he will make loads more than he would with any other figth bar Mayweather.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Oakland, California, USA
    Posts
    417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post

    man, you've got to stop this. as a pac fan, this gets annoying!
    I'm just presenting the FACTS pare that might be considered in the negotiating table...

    But I think all is well now with both boxers receiving 50% on everything including the UK PPV revenues...
    .
    we all know that. but come on. there are still a lot of people here who doesnt think of pac as a ppv draw. thats how people are. we all know pac is the bigger draw here base on what he has accomplished this past year. 3 fights in one year. 2 for the belt, one for recognition. everybody doubted him yet he accomplished what we had to do. if anything, arum is the one who gets the blame for this mess. regardless of what happens, promoters get paid. the dont have to get punched in the head to earn their living. what do they care?
    Without DLH fight, Pac PPV tops 400K with the JMM fight. Now that he beat DLH in spectacular Fashion, his numbers will grow up exponentially.

    What was Hatton's PPV #s? 850K over PBF? But this happens after PBF beat DLH. So you Credit PBF's beating DLH for that. Why do you think Hatton's fight after that is not PPV? Coz it won't sell.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2304
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
    I can't see any reason to justify Pac claiming 60%

    He's not the one with the title.
    I don't believe he's the bigger draw.
    He's actually more accustomed to fighting in the U.S. than Hatton.


    If Pac wants 60% he should put on a championship stake, the winner walks away with 60% the loser 40%
    Pac title is the #1 P4P. Who cares about IBO belt?
    He is the linear champion, the man who beat the man and the true Champion at 140lbs.

    It has nothing to do with belts, Hatton isd the actual champion at 140.

    Oscar wasn't the champion, or a contender at any weight.
    091

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    324
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1529
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Absolutely not. Should be 50/50. Anything else is just disrespectful to the other guy, greedy and arogant on the part of the guy making more imo.
    Only Forum Amature With Well Over 2000 Posts!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,574
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1531
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    well what can I say?



    Let the word wars begin among fans!!!!


    In the end, it will be 60:40 for Pac or else Marquez/ Juarez will be seeing action against Pac this May.






    And Hatton.... will have none.





    I'm a Hatton fan!!!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4390
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    well what can I say?



    Let the word wars begin among fans!!!!


    In the end, it will be 60:40 for Pac or else Marquez/ Juarez will be seeing action against Pac this May.






    And Hatton.... will have none.





    I'm a Hatton fan!!!
    Rocky Juarez

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    well what can I say?



    Let the word wars begin among fans!!!!


    In the end, it will be 60:40 for Pac or else Marquez/ Juarez will be seeing action against Pac this May.






    And Hatton.... will have none.





    I'm a Hatton fan!!!
    Rocky Juarez
    Excuse him. His knowledge is very limited.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,574
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1531
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    hahaha. That's what I heard from a Philippine TV. Hehehe. I was also shocked. Team Pacquaio is doing some psy-war.


    Anyway, I've decided not to debate about this coz negotiations are dirty. The two should fight and money should be decided later. I like C-Los suggestion.

    40-40. The winner gets the remaining 20.


    Btw, I've owned you more than enough VD and stop with your one-liner. hehehe.


    edit: coz you ain't cute....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. POLL: De la hoya - Pacquiao
    By neverscared in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-14-2008, 05:48 AM
  2. Breaking News:Team Pacquiao agreeing at 65-35 share!
    By Panadzzz in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-18-2008, 09:47 AM
  3. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-29-2008, 02:22 PM
  4. Replies: 48
    Last Post: 12-31-2007, 06:28 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-26-2007, 05:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing