Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

[Bomp]

Absolutely not. Should be 50/50. Anything else is just disrespectful to the other guy, greedy and arogant on the part of the guy making more imo.

Like Ricky's 95:5 he got V Castillo?

[Fenster]

Absolutely not. Should be 50/50. Anything else is just disrespectful to the other guy, greedy and arogant on the part of the guy making more imo.

Like Ricky's 95:5 he got V Castillo?

Blimey.. Castillo got beat worse on the negotiation table than the ring.

[HattonTheHammer]

ask a vegas casino/restaurant owner which fighter is not only the biggest draw out of the 2 but in the world and they`ll tell you its ricky.

Anyone but anyone who`s flown over to the states to watch hatton whether it be against castillo, floyd or paulie(which i went to) will tell you just how much money you get through and how the nevada economy gets a welcome pump of british money every time ricky and his army of fans swarm on the area.

Add that to the hundreds of thousands of PPV sales back home at 15 quid a pop (30 US dollars), hatton merchandise etc and i think you`ll find ricky is more than deserving of 50%.

[Boom Boom]

Absolutely not. Should be 50/50. Anything else is just disrespectful to the other guy, greedy and arogant on the part of the guy making more imo.

Like Ricky's 95:5 he got V Castillo?

I didnt know that, but I can see Ricky Making slightly more only because Castillo was not a big draw by then and hadnt looked great in his previous bout. Hatton also had a much larger fanbase. Pac-Hatton thats not the case. Both bring an equal amount to the table. Plus, I assume its for Rickys titles. The champion should never make less than the chalenger, and the last time I checked Mannys last title was at lightweight.