Quote Originally Posted by skel1983 View Post
Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
Quote Originally Posted by levi#1BoxingFan View Post




Only beat him because of a knockdown? Thats the goofiest thing i've ever heard! "Thats like saying he only reason he one was because he punched him in the face more!" Yes it was a close fight and yea knockdowns due tend to give you an advantage duh! Even though Pacquiao is in his prime now, he would easily have taken care of Castillio and Corrales a few years ago with no problems!
First, morrales was not fading, Raheem would have beaten Morrales at any stage of his career. Perhaps it was the onesided schooling he took from raheem that broke his confidence and exposed him as a one dimensional fighter.


Secondly, beat corrales with ease? PACMAN? nah i doubt that at the time when corrales was fighting and could possibly face pacman, pacman didnt have the skills to beat corrales and probably would have been stopped.
Pacman would destroy Chico, i love Chicco but Pac is far to skilled for Corrales
NOW he is...back then when before chico fought castillo, pacman wasn't as sound as he is now. that's why he couldn't finish JMM after three knockdowns...