where would pac be on atg list if....

[Spicoli]

You're more laughable Mr. Erik coz you are making your own fantasy boxing record book Pity yourself Mr. Erik, if you want not to be laugh at, please refer your facts from the record books...

JMM the man to beat at 126?? fighting the likes of Salido, Polo and then lost to Chris John at 126... You're joking Mr. Erik...

PAC is the last man at 126 knocking out the previous man Barrera in 11 one sided rounds... That's the fact...
.

Was it not Marquez hanging with and many would say defeating Your Pacquiao just prior to his fights with Salido and Polo.....you remember "the draw" thus going even up Just a little too much reliance put into trinket collection rather than beating the very best in the respected weight divisions,that goes for all Fighters Imo.......It was john picking up JMMs WBA strap after he was stripped.That last descision between Pac and JMM will be argued for endless moons,even the beloved Roach said it could have gone either way.

Dude, PAC's other 3 lineal titles were clear claims since PAC KO'ed the man to become the man... The JMM fights were close, get over it or else people will laugh at you if you used it as a fact... Facts were compiled in official record books, understand??
.

Dude...your seriously telling me that 'the man' at light was trinket warmer David Diaz?I know he ko'd Santa-Cruz with a lucky brick...and Santa-Cruz 'lost' to The man Casamayor (who JMM Ko'd) but Diaz was not the best by any means.But yeah,the record books say Casa beat Santa-Cruz ,so facts are facts right

I very much am over it as far a JMM and Pacquiao....but dont believe everything you read on Box-rec brutha,I just dont see anyone else constantly posting up Marquez/Manny fight pics,name dropping and rehashing history with your predictability though

[XaduBoxer]

Was it not Marquez hanging with and many would say defeating Your Pacquiao just prior to his fights with Salido and Polo.....you remember "the draw" thus going even up Just a little too much reliance put into trinket collection rather than beating the very best in the respected weight divisions,that goes for all Fighters Imo.......It was john picking up JMMs WBA strap after he was stripped.That last descision between Pac and JMM will be argued for endless moons,even the beloved Roach said it could have gone either way.

Dude, PAC's other 3 lineal titles were clear claims since PAC KO'ed the man to become the man... The JMM fights were close, get over it or else people will laugh at you if you used it as a fact... Facts were compiled in official record books, understand??
.

Dude...your seriously telling me that 'the man' at light was trinket warmer David Diaz?I know he ko'd Santa-Cruz with a lucky brick...and Santa-Cruz 'lost' to The man Casamayor (who JMM Ko'd) but Diaz was not the best by any means.But yeah,the record books say Casa beat Santa-Cruz ,so facts are facts right

I very much am over it as far a JMM and Pacquiao....but dont believe everything you read on Box-rec brutha,I just dont see anyone else constantly posting up Marquez/Manny fight pics,name dropping and rehashing history with your predictability though

Come'on lil' Brother... I only posted that PAC deserves high ATG ranking coz he's the only boxer achieving 4 lineal titles... then someone drag that old PAC-JMM-who-wins issue...

And lil' brother, I think the Casa-Santa Cruz fiasco happened after David Diaz beat Santa Cruz so Diaz can't get credit out of it...
.

[ElTerribleMorales]

Repeating it doesn't make it less impressive either. It just makes it redundant.

I think top 25 is a fair assessment, although in another 10 years we'll have hindsite. I'd say he accomplishes wins over Mosley, Mayeather and JMM he's on a few top 10's, I think Mayweather has to stay undefeated when he loses to and he wins convincinly over JMM otherwise he gets labeled as a old man beater. Sh*t he gets labeled as that now. A win over Cotto has more legacy value than a win over JMM at this point in his career.

exactly what im saying, but i repeat if you don't have Manny as #1 P4P ATG fighter, they tend to get pissy

Dude you're twisting the facts... What we claimed is PAC currently #1 P4P (no arguments in this) and maybe Top 30 ATG (needs lot of discussion)... Don't twist our claims Dude...
.

you and plenty others Pacstraighleft being one of them, kept on insisting that Manny should be considered p4p #1 Greatest of all Time right after the Hatton fight, and if that's not a load of crap i don't know what is

Dude, PAC's other 3 lineal titles were clear claims since PAC KO'ed the man to become the man... The JMM fights were close, get over it or else people will laugh at you if you used it as a fact... Facts were compiled in official record books, understand??
.

Dude...your seriously telling me that 'the man' at light was trinket warmer David Diaz?I know he ko'd Santa-Cruz with a lucky brick...and Santa-Cruz 'lost' to The man Casamayor (who JMM Ko'd) but Diaz was not the best by any means.But yeah,the record books say Casa beat Santa-Cruz ,so facts are facts right

I very much am over it as far a JMM and Pacquiao....but dont believe everything you read on Box-rec brutha,I just dont see anyone else constantly posting up Marquez/Manny fight pics,name dropping and rehashing history with your predictability though

Come'on lil' Brother... I only posted that PAC deserves high ATG ranking coz he's the only boxer achieving 4 lineal titles... then someone drag that old PAC-JMM-who-wins issue...

And lil' brother, I think the Casa-Santa Cruz fiasco happened after David Diaz beat Santa Cruz so Diaz can't get credit out of it...
.

no he can't get any credit cause Diaz is a bum fighter who's 2 biggest wins are a lucky KO in a fight he was losing, and a gift decision against a shot fighter, easy as that

[XaduBoxer]

exactly what im saying, but i repeat if you don't have Manny as #1 P4P ATG fighter, they tend to get pissy

Dude you're twisting the facts... What we claimed is PAC currently #1 P4P (no arguments in this) and maybe Top 30 ATG (needs lot of discussion)... Don't twist our claims Dude...
.

you and plenty others Pacstraighleft being one of them, kept on insisting that Manny should be considered p4p #1 Greatest of all Time right after the Hatton fight, and if that's not a load of crap i don't know what is

Dude, I didn't claim PAC is the #1 GOAT after the Hatton fight... You can post here the link if I really did that... I also doubt Pacstraighleft would make such claim tho I'm not really aware of it...
.