Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 60

Thread: Great Technical Boxers Limited by Mentality

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1284
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Great Technical Boxers Limited by Mentality

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
    Never in any post have I stated or claimed that Ricky Hatton was a good technical boxer.
    If you don't think Ricky Hatton is a good technical boxer, then why in the world did you list him in a thread called "Great Technical Boxers Limited By Mentality"?

    That'd be like if I started a thread titled "Fat Heavyweights," listed James Toney in bold in my post, and then said, "Never in any post have I stated or claimed that James Toney is fat."
    Last edited by SweetPea; 06-21-2009 at 04:38 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4168
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Great Technical Boxers Limited by Mentality

    fart -church -pew. get it?
    Never mind.

    HAtton /squandered /talent.
    Sure he's not great technically but limited mentally 4 sure and effected in the ring by it, worth a mention.

    There are very few Great technical boxers ever, aside from ones limited by mentality: the two just dont go hand in hand.

    Thank God for different styles reaches,heart and build.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2082
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Great Technical Boxers Limited by Mentality

    Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
    Never in any post have I stated or claimed that Ricky Hatton was a good technical boxer.
    If you don't think Ricky Hatton is a good technical boxer, then why in the world did you list him in a thread called "Great Technical Boxers Limited By Mentality"?

    That'd be like if I started a thread titled "Fat Heavyweights," listed James Toney in bold in my post, and then said, "Never in any post have I stated or claimed that James Toney is fat."
    I hate to ruin the nit picking you're so obviously enjoying but I think that Donny is talking about fighters who could have been better if it wasn't for their mind set?

    Maybe if you replace 'Great technical boxers' with 'great boxers on paper' or 'fighters with greater potential' like he clearly means then you wouldn't be so anal about it?

    Where Tua or Golota 'technical' fighters? No... it's clear what the direction here is, go nit pick your face instead.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1284
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Great Technical Boxers Limited by Mentality

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
    Never in any post have I stated or claimed that Ricky Hatton was a good technical boxer.
    If you don't think Ricky Hatton is a good technical boxer, then why in the world did you list him in a thread called "Great Technical Boxers Limited By Mentality"?

    That'd be like if I started a thread titled "Fat Heavyweights," listed James Toney in bold in my post, and then said, "Never in any post have I stated or claimed that James Toney is fat."
    I hate to ruin the nit picking you're so obviously enjoying but I think that Donny is talking about fighters who could have been better if it wasn't for their mind set?

    Maybe if you replace 'Great technical boxers' with 'great boxers on paper' or 'fighters with greater potential' like he clearly means then you wouldn't be so anal about it?

    Where Tua or Golota 'technical' fighters? No... it's clear what the direction here is, go nit pick your face instead.
    Nitpick is one word, not two. How's that for nitpicking?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2082
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Great Technical Boxers Limited by Mentality

    Not bad...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. top technical boxers in thw sport today?
    By oakleyno1 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-27-2008, 07:45 PM
  2. Replies: 29
    Last Post: 01-16-2008, 05:27 AM
  3. TOP 3 COUNTRIES WITH GREAT BOXERS
    By brucelee in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 05:32 AM
  4. Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
    By Beanflicker in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 03-09-2007, 12:58 AM
  5. End of the Road for Four Great Boxers...
    By ArawakWarria in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-28-2007, 04:35 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing