Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 91

Thread: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    HARLEM
    Posts
    2,691
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1131
    Cool Clicks

    Default Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    Just wondering, because they have manny number one, but most of the time the fighters that have been ranked number 1 have gone to other's divisions and beaten them. RJJ, PERNELL, FLOYD, SHANE. Not once did either of them demand a catch weight.
    "Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4353
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Just wondering, because they have manny number one, but most of the time the fighters that have been ranked number 1 have gone to other's divisions and beaten them. RJJ, PERNELL, FLOYD, SHANE. Not once did either of them demand a catch weight.
    None of the fights that propelled Pacquiao to the top of most peoples P4P rankings were fought at a catchweight.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1303
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Just wondering, because they have manny number one, but most of the time the fighters that have been ranked number 1 have gone to other's divisions and beaten them. RJJ, PERNELL, FLOYD, SHANE. Not once did either of them demand a catch weight.
    None of the fights that propelled Pacquiao to the top of most peoples P4P rankings were fought at a catchweight.
    Rightly stated.

    Like the fighters you mentioned, Manny has won the title in many divisions.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    Aren't P4P Rankings all hypothetical? Why should weight even matter?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    877
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1128
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    I think Pac should still be #1 p4p with the demanding of catchweights. I just don't think its even close to sensible for a weightclass title to be on the line when his team is demanding a catchweight for a title. That is a shenanigan that further sets boxing back. But what I do think this demanding of catchweights does is question his confidence and tarnish credibility. The all time greats went directly to the weight classes and fought the best in it. They never tried to gain an advantage by squeezing the bigger guy down to a weight determined by their team. If Pac's team was asking a small welterweight to a catchweight then thats reasonable. But they are going completely opposite. Roach has admitted his tactic by saying PBF is the only welterweight he would let Pac fight at 147 and that Mosley and Cotto have to meet at a catchweight. Leonard was way smaller than Hagler. He went to his weight class. That is all time greatness the fans want to see.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1406
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    The catchweights are bullshit.

    Theres no two ways about it.
    "You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4353
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    The catchweights are bullshit.

    Theres no two ways about it.
    I agree with that, but the fact that's he's demanding catchweights right now has no bearing on the fights that led to him being the #1 P4P fighter.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3363
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    The catchweights are bullshit.

    Theres no two ways about it.
    Why is there so much hate about catchweights?

    I mean what's important is that the best fighters face each other, and do so at the weight that is healthiest for both of them?

    The alphabet belts and even weights divisions don't mean anything in the great scheme of things, both are creations of man to help give the sport a sense of order but they are nothing more than that.

    If Manny was to fight and beat Miguel Cotto at 143 for example it would make no difference at all to the merit of the win than were it fought at 140 or 147 imo.

    They are still fighting each other, and 143 would be the best compromise.

    We shouldn't let entirely man made organisational constructs like weight divisions and belts get in the way of making the best fights.

    That's just letting beaurocracy blind your senses and stopping you from enjoying the great fights.

    What matters in boxing is the best fighters fighting the best fighters. Belts and weight classes are there to help organise that process and provide a structure but they shouldn't supersede the main goal of putting on the best fights.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2119
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    Well its not pac that is yet schedule for a catchweight fight, the p4p #2 and former #1 is. Floyd and jmm is at a catchweight already scheduled. the question should be...can someone who claims to be p4p #1 g.o.a.t fight at a catchweight below his division to fight a fighter 2-3 division below?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2119
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Just wondering, because they have manny number one, but most of the time the fighters that have been ranked number 1 have gone to other's divisions and beaten them. RJJ, PERNELL, FLOYD, SHANE. Not once did either of them demand a catch weight.
    Plus have any of those other p4p guys ever gone up in weight as much as pac?



    I didnt think so.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4416
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    catchweights have nothing to do with p4p rankings.

    I have no problem with fighters that agree with each other fighting at whatever weight. As brought up before my only problem is the title that's on the line.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    454
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    Manny never fought at catchweight though.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    HARLEM
    Posts
    2,691
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1131
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Just wondering, because they have manny number one, but most of the time the fighters that have been ranked number 1 have gone to other's divisions and beaten them. RJJ, PERNELL, FLOYD, SHANE. Not once did either of them demand a catch weight.
    Plus have any of those other p4p guys ever gone up in weight as much as pac?



    I didnt think so.
    Weight or weight class? Because Jones went from JMW to HW..that's plus 40 pounds..

    Manny went from 106 to 145 that's 39lbs
    "Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1497
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Just wondering, because they have manny number one, but most of the time the fighters that have been ranked number 1 have gone to other's divisions and beaten them. RJJ, PERNELL, FLOYD, SHANE. Not once did either of them demand a catch weight.
    Two things
    1) Floyd, RJJ, Pernell, and Shane never went up as many weightclasses as Manny has, and to this point Manny hasn't foughten anyone at a catch weight.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    957
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by blegit View Post
    I think Pac should still be #1 p4p with the demanding of catchweights. I just don't think its even close to sensible for a weightclass title to be on the line when his team is demanding a catchweight for a title. That is a shenanigan that further sets boxing back. But what I do think this demanding of catchweights does is question his confidence and tarnish credibility. The all time greats went directly to the weight classes and fought the best in it. They never tried to gain an advantage by squeezing the bigger guy down to a weight determined by their team. If Pac's team was asking a small welterweight to a catchweight then thats reasonable. But they are going completely opposite. Roach has admitted his tactic by saying PBF is the only welterweight he would let Pac fight at 147 and that Mosley and Cotto have to meet at a catchweight. Leonard was way smaller than Hagler. He went to his weight class. That is all time greatness the fans want to see.
    You mean the same Leonard that demanded Donny Lalonde to fight at 168 for his LHW title. That Leonard? How about JCC demanding Whitaker fight at a catchweight of 145 for his WBC ww title? Or how about Oscar demanding a 39 year old Hopkins come in at 158 for his MW titles? I thought you said the all time greats didn't demand catchweights?

    Pacman isn't the first to demand catchweights, and there isn't any story out there saying that the WW titles are on the line.
    Last edited by generalbulldog; 07-02-2009 at 11:43 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. What do you think of Catch weights?
    By generalbulldog in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 87
    Last Post: 06-19-2009, 12:30 AM
  2. Has There Ever Been Such A High Demand?
    By Bx730NY in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 01-17-2008, 03:31 PM
  3. i demand Mayweather Vs. Pacquiao!!!
    By 1magine in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 12-05-2006, 06:49 AM
  4. Due to popular demand
    By Tito BHB in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-01-2006, 04:37 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing