Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
I would like to see a system put in place by which a manager can be voted out by a certain number of other managers. The purpose would be to facilitate the removal of those managers who are inactive, who push agendas (should this occur), those who refuse my sexual advances, or any other reason that could result in their removal.

Thoughts?
We should consider it.But not get to a point to where we cannibalize ourselves.I think we need to knuckle down and just sort out what needs to be sorted out....the issues,votes,polls,systems and protocol and then get down to maintaining rankings.I know its early and good things take time but seems with every resolved issue...another pops up.I wonder if it has something to do with retaining people?


Oh and sorry to spurn the advances....but Ive never done THAT and am not fond of rope burns.but can I pick my own 'safety word' haaa.

how about one or two rotating manager slots.Given to new members.
I was thinking of it as more of a last resort sort of a thing and a tool by which regular participation would be encouraged.