Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 85

Thread: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    916
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Are people still complaining that Pac won the belt unfairly because he didn't fight at exactly 147?

    Not sure what isn't sinking in? He could have been 141 and would have still been a worthy champion.

    Cotto agreed to the catch weight as part of the deal to do the fight. He didn't have to agree to it.

    I don't see the problem with catch weights, as long as it's within reason of the weight class. A 142 catch weight would have been a bit harsh and unfair.

    Cotto didn't seem to struggle to make 145 and I think any idiot will know those 2lbs didn't make any difference. I think it was almost pointless putting the condition in!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia. Originally from Canada.
    Posts
    293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    849
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by 0james0 View Post
    Are people still complaining that Pac won the belt unfairly because he didn't fight at exactly 147?

    Not sure what isn't sinking in? He could have been 141 and would have still been a worthy champion.

    Cotto agreed to the catch weight as part of the deal to do the fight. He didn't have to agree to it.

    I don't see the problem with catch weights, as long as it's within reason of the weight class. A 142 catch weight would have been a bit harsh and unfair.

    Cotto didn't seem to struggle to make 145 and I think any idiot will know those 2lbs didn't make any difference. I think it was almost pointless putting the condition in!
    We'll never know if the 2lbs would've make a difference and it's impossible for anyone to say otherwise. What deal was made with Cotto is done. I'm talking about Mayweather. He shouldn't have to fight at a catch weight just to appease 'the great manny pacquiao'. Pac has been given enough concessions. Lets see the fight at 147 (where welterweight title bouts are usually held) and let the winner take all.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!
    By Pavlik in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 194
    Last Post: 08-22-2009, 01:32 AM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-28-2009, 03:55 PM
  3. The OTHER Welterweight title fight this weekend!!
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-10-2007, 05:50 PM
  4. 7/14/07 Cintron vs. Matthysse *IBF Welterweight title*
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-26-2007, 10:00 PM
  5. 10 Best Welterweight Title Fights Since 1981
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-14-2006, 08:02 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing