Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 85

Thread: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Intazzz Guest

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post
    Well first of all this is not an anti-pac thread. I feel Pac would of done the same at 147. I just don't see how he could have won the 147 title at 145.. Usually when a boxer comes 1 or 2 pounds under the limit the titles are not on the line. Which leads me to my question.. What are the rules, can you fight for the 147 title at 140 ? First of all catchweights suck but to be able to win titles at heavier weights without fighting at them is B/S... This opens up all possibilities...
    It's not called 147 belt. It's called a welterweight title. Welterweight is anywhere from 141-147. The fight was negotiated at 145, so it's a welterweight fight. If you go over 147, it's called over weight!!! Got it kid?
    lol stfu you pac nut hugger... 147 is the minimum WELTER WEIGHT LIMIT not the LIGHT welter or SUPER lightweight.. if that is the case let's eliminate LIGHT and SUPER and just have a 10 pound divison class.... got it kid?
    WTF! lol 147 is the minimum at welterweight? Kid get we don't need you here.

    Welterweight is between 140.1 to 147 pounds. The Maximum is 147 not minimum.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia. Originally from Canada.
    Posts
    293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    838
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by Intazzz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post

    It's not called 147 belt. It's called a welterweight title. Welterweight is anywhere from 141-147. The fight was negotiated at 145, so it's a welterweight fight. If you go over 147, it's called over weight!!! Got it kid?
    lol stfu you pac nut hugger... 147 is the minimum WELTER WEIGHT LIMIT not the LIGHT welter or SUPER lightweight.. if that is the case let's eliminate LIGHT and SUPER and just have a 10 pound divison class.... got it kid?
    WTF! lol 147 is the minimum at welterweight? Kid get we don't need you here.

    Welterweight is between 140.1 to 147 pounds. The Maximum is 147 not minimum.
    ...Although title fights are usually fought spanning the whole of the weight class (ie. 147 being the maximum).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    375
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by Intazzz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post

    It's not called 147 belt. It's called a welterweight title. Welterweight is anywhere from 141-147. The fight was negotiated at 145, so it's a welterweight fight. If you go over 147, it's called over weight!!! Got it kid?
    lol stfu you pac nut hugger... 147 is the minimum WELTER WEIGHT LIMIT not the LIGHT welter or SUPER lightweight.. if that is the case let's eliminate LIGHT and SUPER and just have a 10 pound divison class.... got it kid?
    WTF! lol 147 is the minimum at welterweight? Kid get we don't need you here.

    Welterweight is between 140.1 to 147 pounds. The Maximum is 147 not minimum.
    Yeah that was brought up already i meant Maximum, and i rephrase the whole question so read everything before you post... the thing is simple.. Championship fights should not have a catch weight a fighter should be allowed to come at the maximum weight of his belt division which was 147 not 145! ps: I been here since 04/05 around there i aint leaving just yet...
    Hidden Content There is no reward for second place

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    905
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post
    Yeah that was brought up already i meant Maximum, and i rephrase the whole question so read everything before you post... the thing is simple.. Championship fights should not have a catch weight a fighter should be allowed to come at the maximum weight of his belt division which was 147 not 145! ps: I been here since 04/05 around there i aint leaving just yet...
    But Cotto agreed to it. As champion he could have declined that catch weight if he really wanted, he prob wasn't bothered by it and thought it was an easy way to make an extra couple £m.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    375
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by 0james0 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post
    Yeah that was brought up already i meant Maximum, and i rephrase the whole question so read everything before you post... the thing is simple.. Championship fights should not have a catch weight a fighter should be allowed to come at the maximum weight of his belt division which was 147 not 145! ps: I been here since 04/05 around there i aint leaving just yet...
    But Cotto agreed to it. As champion he could have declined that catch weight if he really wanted, he prob wasn't bothered by it and thought it was an easy way to make an extra couple £m.
    Like i said this is not an anti-pac thing. Cotto agreed to it and in my opinion Pac would have won at 147. It's just that wbo/wba/wbc bodies that allow catchweight title fights. I simply feel the rule should be change when it comes to a title fight. If you cant take the extra 2 pounds risk that come with the belt then you should not earn it.. catch weights dont bother me, titles being won at them do.. no matter who agrees to what..
    Hidden Content There is no reward for second place

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!
    By Pavlik in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 194
    Last Post: 08-22-2009, 01:32 AM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-28-2009, 03:55 PM
  3. The OTHER Welterweight title fight this weekend!!
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-10-2007, 05:50 PM
  4. 7/14/07 Cintron vs. Matthysse *IBF Welterweight title*
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-26-2007, 10:00 PM
  5. 10 Best Welterweight Title Fights Since 1981
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-14-2006, 08:02 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing