How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

[blegit]

I am a healthy fan of Pac. But I know this is going to rile up the Pac fanatics against me. But lets be honest and actually not ignore the facts when it comes to Pac this time. This was just a ploy to make history by way of 7 division titles. This conformed to Pac just like one of his so called belts is actually the Ring Magazine belt. At featherweight, JMM was the world champion and they fought to a draw so JMM remained the champion. Pac was never a featherweight champion! It was JMM. But because the Ring Magazine, yeah a magazine champ, labeled Pac their champ this somehow counts as a divisional champ and sets it possible to make history. One of the 7 divisional belts of Pac's came by way of catchweight and one came by way of magazine. Like I said I am a Pac fan but I do not suppress the truth(and risk becoming a Pactard). But I have been involved with boxing since I was 5 thats why I keep defending it but the phoniness that comes with boxing is worse than any other sport.

[purtyboy]

I am a healthy fan of Pac. But I know this is going to rile up the Pac fanatics against me. But lets be honest and actually not ignore the facts when it comes to Pac this time. This was just a ploy to make history by way of 7 division titles. This conformed to Pac just like one of his so called belts is actually the Ring Magazine belt. At featherweight, JMM was the champion and they fought to a draw so JMM remained the champion. Pac was never a featherweight champion! It was JMM. But because the Ring Magazine, yeah a magazine champ, labeled Pac their champ this somehow counts as a divisional champ and sets it possible to make history. One of the 7 divisional belts of Pac's came by way of catchweight and one came by way of magazine. Like I said I am a Pac fan but I do not suppress the truth(and risk becoming a Pactard). But I have been involved with boxing since I was 5 thats why I keep defending it but the bullcrap that comes with boxing is worse than any other sport.

Finally a pac fan that is not a hugger... wow not many around here.. Great post man

[brucelee]

I am a healthy fan of Pac. But I know this is going to rile up the Pac fanatics against me. But lets be honest and actually not ignore the facts when it comes to Pac this time. This was just a ploy to make history by way of 7 division titles. This conformed to Pac just like one of his so called belts is actually the Ring Magazine belt. At featherweight, JMM was the champion and they fought to a draw so JMM remained the champion. Pac was never a featherweight champion! It was JMM. But because the Ring Magazine, yeah a magazine champ, labeled Pac their champ this somehow counts as a divisional champ and sets it possible to make history. One of the 7 divisional belts of Pac's came by way of catchweight and one came by way of magazine. Like I said I am a Pac fan but I do not suppress the truth(and risk becoming a Pactard). But I have been involved with boxing since I was 5 thats why I keep defending it but the bullcrap that comes with boxing is worse than any other sport.

Finally a pac fan that is not a hugger... wow not many around here.. Great post man

LOL. I don't remember blegit being a Pac fan here.

Take it from me. I'm the original pacfan here.

All pacfans are huggers and when they are proven correct they become boxing geniuses vice-versa for Pac haters.

[Gandalf]

I am a healthy fan of Pac. But I know this is going to rile up the Pac fanatics against me. But lets be honest and actually not ignore the facts when it comes to Pac this time. This was just a ploy to make history by way of 7 division titles. This conformed to Pac just like one of his so called belts is actually the Ring Magazine belt. At featherweight, JMM was the world champion and they fought to a draw so JMM remained the champion. Pac was never a featherweight champion! It was JMM. But because the Ring Magazine, yeah a magazine champ, labeled Pac their champ this somehow counts as a divisional champ and sets it possible to make history. One of the 7 divisional belts of Pac's came by way of catchweight and one came by way of magazine. Like I said I am a Pac fan but I do not suppress the truth(and risk becoming a Pactard). But I have been involved with boxing since I was 5 thats why I keep defending it but the bullcrap that comes with boxing is worse than any other sport.

Boxing is quite horrendous when you sit back and look at what goes on.

[miron_lang]

I am a healthy fan of Pac. But I know this is going to rile up the Pac fanatics against me. But lets be honest and actually not ignore the facts when it comes to Pac this time. This was just a ploy to make history by way of 7 division titles. This conformed to Pac just like one of his so called belts is actually the Ring Magazine belt. At featherweight, JMM was the world champion and they fought to a draw so JMM remained the champion. Pac was never a featherweight champion! It was JMM. But because the Ring Magazine, yeah a magazine champ, labeled Pac their champ this somehow counts as a divisional champ and sets it possible to make history. One of the 7 divisional belts of Pac's came by way of catchweight and one came by way of magazine. Like I said I am a Pac fan but I do not suppress the truth(and risk becoming a Pactard). But I have been involved with boxing since I was 5 thats why I keep defending it but the phoniness that comes with boxing is worse than any other sport.

LOL

that is FALSE. barrera was the CHAMPION.

WBC, WBO, WBA, IBF all of their champion were beaten by hamed in a particular period who then loses it to Barrera. Barrera also was able to beat Morales for the WBC version but dumps it immediately.

Barrera was recognized as the TRUE/Lineal/RING Featherweight Champion.

The fighter is the Featherweight Champion NOT the ALPHABET ORG. so when they part who ends up the champion? the fighter or the Aplhabet ORG?

Im sure this was posted millions of times already.

[blegit]

I am a healthy fan of Pac. But I know this is going to rile up the Pac fanatics against me. But lets be honest and actually not ignore the facts when it comes to Pac this time. This was just a ploy to make history by way of 7 division titles. This conformed to Pac just like one of his so called belts is actually the Ring Magazine belt. At featherweight, JMM was the world champion and they fought to a draw so JMM remained the champion. Pac was never a featherweight champion! It was JMM. But because the Ring Magazine, yeah a magazine champ, labeled Pac their champ this somehow counts as a divisional champ and sets it possible to make history. One of the 7 divisional belts of Pac's came by way of catchweight and one came by way of magazine. Like I said I am a Pac fan but I do not suppress the truth(and risk becoming a Pactard). But I have been involved with boxing since I was 5 thats why I keep defending it but the phoniness that comes with boxing is worse than any other sport.

LOL

that is FALSE. barrera was the CHAMPION.

WBC, WBO, WBA, IBF all of their champion were beaten by hamed in a particular period who then loses it to Barrera. Barrera also was able to beat Morales for the WBC version but dumps it immediately.

Barrera was recognized as the TRUE/Lineal/RING Featherweight Champion.

The fighter is the Featherweight Champion NOT the ALPHABET ORG. so when they part who ends up the champion? the fighter or the Aplhabet ORG?

Im sure this was posted millions of times already.

I know Barrera was considered the peoples champion but JMM had 2 belts. What belts did Pacquiao get at 126? Otherwise the champ is just a popular opinion.

[Fenster]

I am a healthy fan of Pac. But I know this is going to rile up the Pac fanatics against me. But lets be honest and actually not ignore the facts when it comes to Pac this time. This was just a ploy to make history by way of 7 division titles. This conformed to Pac just like one of his so called belts is actually the Ring Magazine belt. At featherweight, JMM was the world champion and they fought to a draw so JMM remained the champion. Pac was never a featherweight champion! It was JMM. But because the Ring Magazine, yeah a magazine champ, labeled Pac their champ this somehow counts as a divisional champ and sets it possible to make history. One of the 7 divisional belts of Pac's came by way of catchweight and one came by way of magazine. Like I said I am a Pac fan but I do not suppress the truth(and risk becoming a Pactard). But I have been involved with boxing since I was 5 thats why I keep defending it but the phoniness that comes with boxing is worse than any other sport.

LOL

that is FALSE. barrera was the CHAMPION.

WBC, WBO, WBA, IBF all of their champion were beaten by hamed in a particular period who then loses it to Barrera. Barrera also was able to beat Morales for the WBC version but dumps it immediately.

Barrera was recognized as the TRUE/Lineal/RING Featherweight Champion.

The fighter is the Featherweight Champion NOT the ALPHABET ORG. so when they part who ends up the champion? the fighter or the Aplhabet ORG?

Im sure this was posted millions of times already.

I know Barrera was considered the peoples champion but JMM had 2 belts. What belts did Pacquiao get at 126? Otherwise the champ is just a popular opinion.

Barrera was the lineal champ. THE man.

To further strengthen Miron Lang's explanation - you can trace the "man who beat the man" through Hamed to Wilfredo Vazquez. So there really is no doubt Pac was THE true featherweight champion after beating Barrera.