We can't possibly know how Jones would've acted if this kind of pressure was placed on him in his day, so that's a pointless argument.

I was suspicious before Floyd Sr said anything, but I kept my mouth shut. Then the old coot rambled on about Pacquiao's little secret. Still, I kept my mouth shut. Then Malignaggi made a few very good points and while I agreed that a few of them were worthwhile, still I didn't support either side of the argument (why put any pressure on the guy or his loyal fan-base with only some suspicious physical signs). Then Mayweather mentions the words 'conclusive', 'blood' and 'testing' and all hell breaks loose. That's when I became aware of just how likely it was that he was actually using. Use your head. His (and his team's) actions don't make sense. His physicality shows signs of usage.. not to mention numerous statistical signs.

On top of all of those signals, it brings the bigger issue of better testing methods in terms of the entire sport, into the spotlight, which can't be a bad thing for a sport that was once considered 'mainstream'. So to answer your question, no I didn't only come up with this argument because I was tricked by that crafty Mayweather Sr; I have been suspicious for a while. Since 2010 rolled around I think I've had more than ample reason to be more than suspicious too