No he didn't he got caught late in a fight he mostly dominated, and got up by the count of 8. When the round was already over, even if the ref wouldn't of told.
Librado Andrade to go back to the neutral corner, the round was over at that point so it didn't matter. All Lucian Bute had to do was stand up and respond to the ref which he did.
Andre Dirrell beat your boy though, and your boy was also pushd to his limit. By Brian Magee for crying out loud, he will be found out soon. Im just amazed he's got this far without a loss yet.
And Lucian Bute will destroy Carl Froch, and i'll bet with you or anyone regarding that.
one dangerous horrible bloke
You must be joking actually count how long, it took Lucian Bute to get up. It was 8 secodns he beat the count, then the ref told Librado Andrade to go in the neutral corner.
But even if he hadn't of, it wouldn't of mattered because the round was over when he went down. Its just you can't be saved in the final round, which is why the ref firstly had to decide whether or not to let Lucian Bute continue.
Your boy just plainly got a gift decision, and lost by atleast 3 rounds.
30 seconds? really? FAIL
Dirrell beat Froch period. The whole justification for Froch winning was "he was coming forward" He wasn't landing shit, he wasn't throwing shit, he hadn't a clue of what to do. As long as he was walking forward though he grabs the cards. I think Fenster put it best when he stated that the judges say Dirrell falling all over the place and probably held it against him even though he was clearly winning the rounds.
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
carl froch spent 36minutes walking towards andre dirrell with his fists ready to fly. Dirrell spent 36minutes doing a running/falling over double act. Froch is the champion, and its in his home country. How the hell do you expect to get a decision??
Dirrell wanted no part of froch, the better fighter won
one dangerous horrible bloke
Dirrell spent many rounds being the BOXER and peppered Froch, he even hurt Froch a few times. I'm pretty sure there is a good reason they didn't show the punch stats, cause Dirrell would have been light years ahead. Dirrell did act like a biatch in the second half of the fight I admit that, but he still should have won.
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
When i first watched the fight through a showtime stream online (i know im a tight arse) i had froch maybe a round or so up. When i actually bothered to take out the patriotic commentating and watch it in realtime its clear for all to see that froch won that fight as easy as he won the pascal fight
one dangerous horrible bloke
So what if Andre Dirrell didn't stand toe to toe ? boxing is about ring generalship, defense, clean/effective punching. Andre Dirrell landed the better punches, for the most part he controlled the fight, fighting when he wanted to and not allowing Carl Froch to get off.
He had Carl Froch rocked twice, where as Andre Dirrell was never hurt. Yes i don't like Andre Dirrell style but your British bias is clouding your judgment. Getting ready to let your fists fly as you put it means what exactly ?
The fact is he hardly landed anything, and his pressure was ineffective. Andre Dirrell won hands down and a majority of the boxing fans feel that way aswell.
one dangerous horrible bloke
HTH, are you willing to make a little sig bet that Froch loses against Kessler this week-end and therefore will erase that silly idea that he's the best at at 168?
Hidden Content
That's the way it is, not the way it ends
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks