Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post

He got pissed off because he headbutted Evander and it didn't work so he bit him?
Not in that fight, no.
Another noticeable thing in the fight, the second one, which is obvious after watching the first one is that Holyfield clearly understood that Mike lead with his head so he kept his own down as to possibly catch Tyson and make him cause the collision of domes. Either way the butts were clearly caused by Tyson not Evander.
So you say that Holyfield seeing how Tyson comes in decided to lower his head so that his head would butt with Tysons chin so he'd catch him with it. But in the same sentence say that the butts were caused by Tyson not Evander? So basically if Evander didn't lower his head to intentionally cause the top of his head to hit Tyson coming in that Tyson still would have been headbutted? Tyson always leaded with his head, Holyfield made the decision to lower his head so he could butt him intentionally with it using Tyson's force to cause it.

If Wladimer Klitschko fought Cris Arreola and Cris came in with his head, if Wladimer decides to lower his head to catch Cris's coming in, is it because of Arreola that the headbutts are happening? or is it because Wladimer lowered his head to ensure that it happened?