Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 212

Thread: De La Hoya: Pacquiao makes fighters lose on the scales 1st

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3373
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: De La Hoya: Pacquiao makes fighters lose on the scales 1st

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Yes you should stick to correcting my spelling cuz you do a very bad job of debating boxing.

    It's the job of the fighter going up in weight to accomodate the weight class.

    IT IS NOT THE JOB OF THE WEIGHTCLASS TO ACCOMODATE THE FIGHTER COMING UP!

    You're whole argument is irrelevant bullshit.

    So now you want to go to same day weigh ins just to make it easier for manny pacquiao? What a load of crap.
    The 24 hour weigh in has a more recent history than catchweight fights my uninformed friend. Even Henry Armstrong fought at catchweight back in his day. They did not have 24 hour weigh in's however.

    That is a feature of modern television, it's not part of boxing tradition. Catchweights have been around for a 100 years. The 24 hour weigh in only since the 80's.

    As for the weight class accomodating him. Manny and Margarito's fight was sanctioned by the relevant governing bodies and the WBC belt organisation. What rules were broken exactly, apart from the ones in your head?
    The sport is what it is.

    Before signing a fight. Fighters know what the weight divisions are and know the weigh in will take place 24 hours in advance. Right.

    So if you can't adhere to those paramaters don't fight in a weightclass that's out of your depth.

    Simple.
    I agree, and catchweights are part of the sport. Simple.
    Right and so BACK TO THE ORIGONAL QUESTION OF THE TREAD which you are avoiding like the plague.

    Did pacquiao beat his opponants on the sales?

    The answer is... of course otherise he would have fought these guys at their most comfortable weight class.

    Pac brings them down to a catch weight for a reason. To weaken them. THERE IS NO OTHER EXPLAINATION.

    If he believed he could beat a 154 fighter he'd fight them at 154.

    If he thought he could have beat cotto at 147 the fight would have been at 147.

    If he thought he could beat ODH at 154 he would have fought at 154.

    He didn't think he could win any of those fights at those weights. If he did he would have done them with out the catch weight. It's a no fucking brainer no matter how you try and rationalize it.

    And finally mr dildo I take it you want to abolish all weight divisions and do avery fight at whatever the fighters argee.
    I ahve actually covered this step by step in earlier posts. It's not my fault you havn't bothered to read them.

    But the answer is no.

    Oscar held all the negotiating power against Manny. It wasn't a case of Manny dragging Oscar down to 147, it was Oscar dragging a little guy up three weight classes. All of the prefight criticism was levelled at Oscar. Do you disagree with this?

    Margarito was a welterweight. Had they fought at welterweight would you have disapproved? He actually GAINED weight compared to the entire rest of his career. Mosley must have beat a really weight drained Margarito right, seeing as he weighed in 4lbs lighter than he did against Manny...........

    Cotto lost 1lb. A single 1lb. I will say it again, 1 (one) lb.

    Does that cause a man to physically drain. I really think not. I am sure there is a point where a pound can make a huge difference but that was not it for Cotto. He chose to weigh in against Clottey at 146. He voluntarily decided that 146 lbs was his optimum weight.

    Nobody weight ranges from optimum to weight drained in the course of one single pound.

    The difference from weighing 144 to 143 might be significant for Cotto, but not from 146 to 145.

    What part of this do you disagree with?


    Please state which fighters you think lost the fight at the scales and the evidence you use to demonstrate this.......................


    And I completely disagree with you regarding weakening opponents. Manny's maximum weight is 148 lbs. We both acknowledge that he never weighs more than this.

    So if a fighter wants to fight him, he wants them to fight around that weight limit. Margarito at a catchweight meant a weight differential of 148 vs 165, 17lbs. At no catchweight it might have been 148 vs 170. The point is Manny is not getting bigger, only his opponent.

    Why would I want to abolish weight classes? You are the one who seems to insist that the bigger guy must be allowed to weigh as much as he likes. I'm in favour of setting an agree fight limit.
    Last edited by Kev; 12-10-2010 at 08:07 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,963
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: De La Hoya: Pacquiao makes fighters lose on the scales 1st

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Yes you should stick to correcting my spelling cuz you do a very bad job of debating boxing.

    It's the job of the fighter going up in weight to accomodate the weight class.

    IT IS NOT THE JOB OF THE WEIGHTCLASS TO ACCOMODATE THE FIGHTER COMING UP!

    You're whole argument is irrelevant bullshit.

    So now you want to go to same day weigh ins just to make it easier for manny pacquiao? What a load of crap.

    The 24 hour weigh in has a more recent history than catchweight fights my uninformed friend. Even Henry Armstrong fought at catchweight back in his day. They did not have 24 hour weigh in's however.

    That is a feature of modern television, it's not part of boxing tradition. Catchweights have been around for a 100 years. The 24 hour weigh in only since the 80's.

    As for the weight class accomodating him. Manny and Margarito's fight was sanctioned by the relevant governing bodies and the WBC belt organisation. What rules were broken exactly, apart from the ones in your head?
    The sport is what it is.

    Before signing a fight. Fighters know what the weight divisions are and know the weigh in will take place 24 hours in advance. Right.

    So if you can't adhere to those paramaters don't fight in a weightclass that's out of your depth.

    Simple.
    I agree, and catchweights are part of the sport. Simple.
    Right and so BACK TO THE ORIGONAL QUESTION OF THE TREAD which you are avoiding like the plague.

    Did pacquiao beat his opponants on the sales?

    The answer is... of course otherise he would have fought these guys at their most comfortable weight class.

    Pac brings them down to a catch weight for a reason. To weaken them. THERE IS NO OTHER EXPLAINATION.

    If he believed he could beat a 154 fighter he'd fight them at 154.

    If he thought he could have beat cotto at 147 the fight would have been at 147.

    If he thought he could beat ODH at 154 he would have fought at 154.

    He didn't think he could win any of those fights at those weights. If he did he would have done them with out the catch weight. It's a no fucking brainer no matter how you try and rationalize it.

    And finally mr dildo I take it you want to abolish all weight divisions and do avery fight at whatever the fighters argee.
    I ahve actually covered this step by step in earlier posts. It's not my fault you havn't bothered to read them.

    But the answer is no.

    Oscar held all the negotiating power against Manny. It wasn't a case of Manny dragging Oscar down to 147, it was Oscar dragging a little guy up three weight classes. All of the prefight criticism was levelled at Oscar. Do you disagree with this?

    Margarito was a welterweight. Had they fought at welterweight would you have disapproved? He actually GAINED weight compared to the entire rest of his career. Mosley must have beat a really weight drained Margarito right, seeing as he weighed in 4lbs lighter than he did against Manny...........

    Cotto lost 1lb. A single 1lb. I will say it again, 1 (one) lb.

    Does that cause a man to physically drain. I really think not. I am sure there is a point where a pound can make a huge difference but that was not it for Cotto. He chose to weigh in against Clottey at 146. He voluntarily decided that 146 lbs was his optimum weight.

    Nobody weight ranges from optimum to weight drained in the course of one single pound.

    The difference from weighing 144 to 143 might be significant for Cotto, but not from 146 to 145.

    What part of this do you disagree with?


    Please state which fighters you think lost the fight at the scales and the evidence you use to demonstrate this.......................


    And I completely disagree with you regarding weakening opponents. Manny's maximum weight is 148 lbs. We both acknowledge that he never weighs more than this.

    So if a fighter wants to fight him, he wants them to fight around that weight limit. Margarito at a catchweight meant a weight differential of 148 vs 165, 17lbs. At no catchweight it might have been 148 vs 170. The point is Manny is not getting bigger, only his opponent.

    Why would I want to abolish weight classes? You are the one who seems to insist that the bigger guy must be allowed to weigh as much as he likes. I'm in favour of setting an agree fight limit.
    I'll stick to the key facts which I've already highlighted

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post

    If he believed he could beat a 154 fighter he'd fight them at 154.

    If he thought he could have beat cotto at 147 the fight would have been at 147.

    If he thought he could beat ODH at 154 he would have fought at 154.

    He didn't think he could win any of those fights at those weights. If he did he would have done them with out the catch weight. It's a no fucking brainer no matter how you try and rationalize it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3373
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: De La Hoya: Pacquiao makes fighters lose on the scales 1st

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Yes you should stick to correcting my spelling cuz you do a very bad job of debating boxing.

    It's the job of the fighter going up in weight to accomodate the weight class.

    IT IS NOT THE JOB OF THE WEIGHTCLASS TO ACCOMODATE THE FIGHTER COMING UP!

    You're whole argument is irrelevant bullshit.

    So now you want to go to same day weigh ins just to make it easier for manny pacquiao? What a load of crap.

    The 24 hour weigh in has a more recent history than catchweight fights my uninformed friend. Even Henry Armstrong fought at catchweight back in his day. They did not have 24 hour weigh in's however.

    That is a feature of modern television, it's not part of boxing tradition. Catchweights have been around for a 100 years. The 24 hour weigh in only since the 80's.

    As for the weight class accomodating him. Manny and Margarito's fight was sanctioned by the relevant governing bodies and the WBC belt organisation. What rules were broken exactly, apart from the ones in your head?
    The sport is what it is.

    Before signing a fight. Fighters know what the weight divisions are and know the weigh in will take place 24 hours in advance. Right.

    So if you can't adhere to those paramaters don't fight in a weightclass that's out of your depth.

    Simple.
    I agree, and catchweights are part of the sport. Simple.
    Right and so BACK TO THE ORIGONAL QUESTION OF THE TREAD which you are avoiding like the plague.

    Did pacquiao beat his opponants on the sales?

    The answer is... of course otherise he would have fought these guys at their most comfortable weight class.

    Pac brings them down to a catch weight for a reason. To weaken them. THERE IS NO OTHER EXPLAINATION.

    If he believed he could beat a 154 fighter he'd fight them at 154.

    If he thought he could have beat cotto at 147 the fight would have been at 147.

    If he thought he could beat ODH at 154 he would have fought at 154.

    He didn't think he could win any of those fights at those weights. If he did he would have done them with out the catch weight. It's a no fucking brainer no matter how you try and rationalize it.

    And finally mr dildo I take it you want to abolish all weight divisions and do avery fight at whatever the fighters argee.
    I ahve actually covered this step by step in earlier posts. It's not my fault you havn't bothered to read them.

    But the answer is no.

    Oscar held all the negotiating power against Manny. It wasn't a case of Manny dragging Oscar down to 147, it was Oscar dragging a little guy up three weight classes. All of the prefight criticism was levelled at Oscar. Do you disagree with this?

    Margarito was a welterweight. Had they fought at welterweight would you have disapproved? He actually GAINED weight compared to the entire rest of his career. Mosley must have beat a really weight drained Margarito right, seeing as he weighed in 4lbs lighter than he did against Manny...........

    Cotto lost 1lb. A single 1lb. I will say it again, 1 (one) lb.

    Does that cause a man to physically drain. I really think not. I am sure there is a point where a pound can make a huge difference but that was not it for Cotto. He chose to weigh in against Clottey at 146. He voluntarily decided that 146 lbs was his optimum weight.

    Nobody weight ranges from optimum to weight drained in the course of one single pound.

    The difference from weighing 144 to 143 might be significant for Cotto, but not from 146 to 145.

    What part of this do you disagree with?


    Please state which fighters you think lost the fight at the scales and the evidence you use to demonstrate this.......................


    And I completely disagree with you regarding weakening opponents. Manny's maximum weight is 148 lbs. We both acknowledge that he never weighs more than this.

    So if a fighter wants to fight him, he wants them to fight around that weight limit. Margarito at a catchweight meant a weight differential of 148 vs 165, 17lbs. At no catchweight it might have been 148 vs 170. The point is Manny is not getting bigger, only his opponent.

    Why would I want to abolish weight classes? You are the one who seems to insist that the bigger guy must be allowed to weigh as much as he likes. I'm in favour of setting an agree fight limit.
    I'll stick to the key facts which I've already highlighted

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post

    If he believed he could beat a 154 fighter he'd fight them at 154.

    If he thought he could have beat cotto at 147 the fight would have been at 147.

    If he thought he could beat ODH at 154 he would have fought at 154.

    He didn't think he could win any of those fights at those weights. If he did he would have done them with out the catch weight. It's a no fucking brainer no matter how you try and rationalize it.
    Again, Manny didn't beat a 150lb man for the 154 lb title, he beat a 165lb man. If Margarito entered the ring at 154lb he likely would have lost even worse.

    24 hour weigh ins are not boxing tradition, they are modern media demanded invention. They unfairly favour the bigger fighter.

    Also Manny has only insisted on catchweight fights after rising through 10 (TEN!!!!) weight classes.

    If Sergio Martinez fought Jean Pascal at 173lbs you would be outraged?
    If Nonito Donaire fought Juan Guzman at 138lb you would be outraged?
    If Jean Pascal fought David Haye at 215lbs you would be outraged?

    All of these fights sound like massive massive massive risks for the smaller man.

    No other fighter in the history of boxing has done what Manny has done, even allowing for two catchweights. He has done more to raise interest for the sport worldwide than any other currently active fighter.

    You are simply not a fan of boxing if you are not a fan of Manny Pacquaio.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,963
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: De La Hoya: Pacquiao makes fighters lose on the scales 1st

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Yes you should stick to correcting my spelling cuz you do a very bad job of debating boxing.

    It's the job of the fighter going up in weight to accomodate the weight class.

    IT IS NOT THE JOB OF THE WEIGHTCLASS TO ACCOMODATE THE FIGHTER COMING UP!

    You're whole argument is irrelevant bullshit.

    So now you want to go to same day weigh ins just to make it easier for manny pacquiao? What a load of crap.

    The 24 hour weigh in has a more recent history than catchweight fights my uninformed friend. Even Henry Armstrong fought at catchweight back in his day. They did not have 24 hour weigh in's however.

    That is a feature of modern television, it's not part of boxing tradition. Catchweights have been around for a 100 years. The 24 hour weigh in only since the 80's.

    As for the weight class accomodating him. Manny and Margarito's fight was sanctioned by the relevant governing bodies and the WBC belt organisation. What rules were broken exactly, apart from the ones in your head?
    The sport is what it is.

    Before signing a fight. Fighters know what the weight divisions are and know the weigh in will take place 24 hours in advance. Right.

    So if you can't adhere to those paramaters don't fight in a weightclass that's out of your depth.

    Simple.
    I agree, and catchweights are part of the sport. Simple.
    Right and so BACK TO THE ORIGONAL QUESTION OF THE TREAD which you are avoiding like the plague.

    Did pacquiao beat his opponants on the sales?

    The answer is... of course otherise he would have fought these guys at their most comfortable weight class.

    Pac brings them down to a catch weight for a reason. To weaken them. THERE IS NO OTHER EXPLAINATION.

    If he believed he could beat a 154 fighter he'd fight them at 154.

    If he thought he could have beat cotto at 147 the fight would have been at 147.

    If he thought he could beat ODH at 154 he would have fought at 154.

    He didn't think he could win any of those fights at those weights. If he did he would have done them with out the catch weight. It's a no fucking brainer no matter how you try and rationalize it.

    And finally mr dildo I take it you want to abolish all weight divisions and do avery fight at whatever the fighters argee.
    I ahve actually covered this step by step in earlier posts. It's not my fault you havn't bothered to read them.

    But the answer is no.

    Oscar held all the negotiating power against Manny. It wasn't a case of Manny dragging Oscar down to 147, it was Oscar dragging a little guy up three weight classes. All of the prefight criticism was levelled at Oscar. Do you disagree with this?

    Margarito was a welterweight. Had they fought at welterweight would you have disapproved? He actually GAINED weight compared to the entire rest of his career. Mosley must have beat a really weight drained Margarito right, seeing as he weighed in 4lbs lighter than he did against Manny...........

    Cotto lost 1lb. A single 1lb. I will say it again, 1 (one) lb.

    Does that cause a man to physically drain. I really think not. I am sure there is a point where a pound can make a huge difference but that was not it for Cotto. He chose to weigh in against Clottey at 146. He voluntarily decided that 146 lbs was his optimum weight.

    Nobody weight ranges from optimum to weight drained in the course of one single pound.

    The difference from weighing 144 to 143 might be significant for Cotto, but not from 146 to 145.

    What part of this do you disagree with?


    Please state which fighters you think lost the fight at the scales and the evidence you use to demonstrate this.......................


    And I completely disagree with you regarding weakening opponents. Manny's maximum weight is 148 lbs. We both acknowledge that he never weighs more than this.

    So if a fighter wants to fight him, he wants them to fight around that weight limit. Margarito at a catchweight meant a weight differential of 148 vs 165, 17lbs. At no catchweight it might have been 148 vs 170. The point is Manny is not getting bigger, only his opponent.

    Why would I want to abolish weight classes? You are the one who seems to insist that the bigger guy must be allowed to weigh as much as he likes. I'm in favour of setting an agree fight limit.
    I'll stick to the key facts which I've already highlighted

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post

    If he believed he could beat a 154 fighter he'd fight them at 154.

    If he thought he could have beat cotto at 147 the fight would have been at 147.

    If he thought he could beat ODH at 154 he would have fought at 154.

    He didn't think he could win any of those fights at those weights. If he did he would have done them with out the catch weight. It's a no fucking brainer no matter how you try and rationalize it.
    Again, Manny didn't beat a 150lb man for the 154 lb title, he beat a 165lb man. If Margarito entered the ring at 154lb he likely would have lost even worse.

    24 hour weigh ins are not boxing tradition, they are modern media demanded invention. They unfairly favour the bigger fighter.

    Also Manny has only insisted on catchweight fights after rising through 10 (TEN!!!!) weight classes.

    If Sergio Martinez fought Jean Pascal at 173lbs you would be outraged?
    If Nonito Donaire fought Juan Guzman at 138lb you would be outraged?
    If Jean Pascal fought David Haye at 215lbs you would be outraged?

    All of these fights sound like massive massive massive risks for the smaller man.

    No other fighter in the history of boxing has done what Manny has done, even allowing for two catchweights. He has done more to raise interest for the sport worldwide than any other currently active fighter.

    You are simply not a fan of boxing if you are not a fan of Manny Pacquaio.
    BIGGEST LOAD OF TOSH I'VE HEARD!!!!!!!!

    No he beat 150 pound man for the 154 title. No fighter in ANY weight division enters the ring at their weigh in weight. That argument is a complete nonsencical joke. I can't believe you've even tried to go that route. Absolute CRAP!

    You can't be a fan of boxing because you are happy for a fighter to try and rewrite the rule book.

    HOW CAN A 154 TITLE BE WON AT 150 POUNDS!? It's absurd. and the fact that that gets a pat on the back from you shows you have nothing but contempt for the integrity of the sport.

    The fact you are happy and in favour of these handicap matches shows you don't give a shit about fairness in sport.

    If I watch a fight I want to see both guys at 100%. Not one get at 100% and another guy at 80% or less.

    Dildo as far as I'm concerned you are a complete joke. You have no passion for the sport. Hang your head in shame for that last post.

    And again back to THE ISSUE OF THE THREAD!

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post

    If he believed he could beat a 154 fighter he'd fight them at 154.

    If he thought he could have beat cotto at 147 the fight would have been at 147.

    If he thought he could beat ODH at 154 he would have fought at 154.

    He didn't think he could win any of those fights at those weights. If he did he would have done them with out the catch weight. It's a no fucking brainer no matter how you try and rationalize it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: De La Hoya: Pacquiao makes fighters lose on the scales 1st

    Bilbo, there is no reason why you cannot enjoy watching Manny fight but at the same time be critical of the continual use of catchweights. Just as you can appreciate that Israel is a democracy you can be extremely critical of government led state sponsored terrorism. They aren't exclusive ways of thinking.

    I agree with Hornfinger in that there was no good reason not to fight Margarito at 154 and Cotto at 147. I will give Manny a pass with ODLH though as he was a big underdog and was jumping up 2 weight divisions for the first time. It was Oscar that wanted to play the weight game that night and he paid. And that's fair enough.

    If Pac wants to fight the big guys it would be good for the sport to see him fight within the existing weight bands. If it is too much for him them he should really stay at JWW.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,963
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: De La Hoya: Pacquiao makes fighters lose on the scales 1st

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Bilbo, there is no reason why you cannot enjoy watching Manny fight but at the same time be critical of the continual use of catchweights. Just as you can appreciate that Israel is a democracy you can be extremely critical of government led state sponsored terrorism. They aren't exclusive ways of thinking.

    I agree with Hornfinger in that there was no good reason not to fight Margarito at 154 and Cotto at 147. I will give Manny a pass with ODLH though as he was a big underdog and was jumping up 2 weight divisions for the first time. It was Oscar that wanted to play the weight game that night and he paid. And that's fair enough.

    If Pac wants to fight the big guys it would be good for the sport to see him fight within the existing weight bands. If it is too much for him them he should really stay at JWW.
    100% agree.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Not in the Neutral Corner
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    831
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: De La Hoya: Pacquiao makes fighters lose on the scales 1st

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Bilbo, there is no reason why you cannot enjoy watching Manny fight but at the same time be critical of the continual use of catchweights. Just as you can appreciate that Israel is a democracy you can be extremely critical of government led state sponsored terrorism. They aren't exclusive ways of thinking.

    I agree with Hornfinger in that there was no good reason not to fight Margarito at 154 and Cotto at 147. I will give Manny a pass with ODLH though as he was a big underdog and was jumping up 2 weight divisions for the first time. It was Oscar that wanted to play the weight game that night and he paid. And that's fair enough.

    If Pac wants to fight the big guys it would be good for the sport to see him fight within the existing weight bands. If it is too much for him them he should really stay at JWW.
    If it's too much for Pacquiao's opponents, then they should not have agreed to the fight. I am not saying that it's his opponent's fault nor is it Manny's fault. It goes both ways. They agreed to the fight knowing that they are still capable of beating Manny. If they knew that such catchweight is detrimental and that they are sure they can't win the fight and yet agreed to it, then they are the ones who are crazy and would be at fault.

    If the catchweight is allowed by the boxing association, then why would someone fault the boxer for using it. Blame it on those boxing organizations. Have them abolish the catchweight.

    I wished Pacquiao fought Cotto without a catchweight. Margarito is a different story. Several boxers fought at a catchweight: Henry Armstrong, Julio Cesar Chavez, Pernell Whitaker, Oscar dela Hoya, Roy Jones, Sugar Ray Leonard, Bernard Hopkins, etc. The catchweights didn't tarnish these boxers reputation. I don't even think the general public remembers that they fought at a catchweight. Manny's catchweight fights would not even be remembered as such several years after he retires.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: De La Hoya: Pacquiao makes fighters lose on the scales 1st

    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Bilbo, there is no reason why you cannot enjoy watching Manny fight but at the same time be critical of the continual use of catchweights. Just as you can appreciate that Israel is a democracy you can be extremely critical of government led state sponsored terrorism. They aren't exclusive ways of thinking.

    I agree with Hornfinger in that there was no good reason not to fight Margarito at 154 and Cotto at 147. I will give Manny a pass with ODLH though as he was a big underdog and was jumping up 2 weight divisions for the first time. It was Oscar that wanted to play the weight game that night and he paid. And that's fair enough.

    If Pac wants to fight the big guys it would be good for the sport to see him fight within the existing weight bands. If it is too much for him them he should really stay at JWW.
    If it's too much for Pacquiao's opponents, then they should not have agreed to the fight. I am not saying that it's his opponent's fault nor is it Manny's fault. It goes both ways. They agreed to the fight knowing that they are still capable of beating Manny. If they knew that such catchweight is detrimental and that they are sure they can't win the fight and yet agreed to it, then they are the ones who are crazy and would be at fault.

    If the catchweight is allowed by the boxing association, then why would someone fault the boxer for using it. Blame it on those boxing organizations. Have them abolish the catchweight.

    I wished Pacquiao fought Cotto without a catchweight. Margarito is a different story. Several boxers fought at a catchweight: Henry Armstrong, Julio Cesar Chavez, Pernell Whitaker, Oscar dela Hoya, Roy Jones, Sugar Ray Leonard, Bernard Hopkins, etc. The catchweights didn't tarnish these boxers reputation. I don't even think the general public remembers that they fought at a catchweight. Manny's catchweight fights would not even be remembered as such several years after he retires.
    Yes, it does work both ways.

    As a man of principles I wouldn't sell out, but it seems in professional boxing it is all too common. If you were offered a 12 round fight to secure your retirement, then you most likely would. And in the process would you then quibble over a pound or two that the richest fighter in the world argued about? No you would take the money and run and so that is what these opponents have done. Sure, they have fought Pac, but they have fought him at weights neither of them were used to. Not even Margarito.

    And yes we could blame the administrations. But this is boxing. Have you suddenly entered the Nobel peace prize commitee? And even they can get it very wrong. You say that people will not remember. Okay, Bilbo has blacked out the past. But people like me don't and there are a lot of us. Sure Pac is exciting, but there are question marks and people who aren't into propaganda will question him.

    You will just have to deal with that.
    Last edited by Gandalf; 12-11-2010 at 05:54 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3373
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: De La Hoya: Pacquiao makes fighters lose on the scales 1st

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Yes you should stick to correcting my spelling cuz you do a very bad job of debating boxing.

    It's the job of the fighter going up in weight to accomodate the weight class.

    IT IS NOT THE JOB OF THE WEIGHTCLASS TO ACCOMODATE THE FIGHTER COMING UP!

    You're whole argument is irrelevant bullshit.

    So now you want to go to same day weigh ins just to make it easier for manny pacquiao? What a load of crap.

    The 24 hour weigh in has a more recent history than catchweight fights my uninformed friend. Even Henry Armstrong fought at catchweight back in his day. They did not have 24 hour weigh in's however.

    That is a feature of modern television, it's not part of boxing tradition. Catchweights have been around for a 100 years. The 24 hour weigh in only since the 80's.

    As for the weight class accomodating him. Manny and Margarito's fight was sanctioned by the relevant governing bodies and the WBC belt organisation. What rules were broken exactly, apart from the ones in your head?
    The sport is what it is.

    Before signing a fight. Fighters know what the weight divisions are and know the weigh in will take place 24 hours in advance. Right.

    So if you can't adhere to those paramaters don't fight in a weightclass that's out of your depth.

    Simple.
    I agree, and catchweights are part of the sport. Simple.
    Right and so BACK TO THE ORIGONAL QUESTION OF THE TREAD which you are avoiding like the plague.

    Did pacquiao beat his opponants on the sales?

    The answer is... of course otherise he would have fought these guys at their most comfortable weight class.

    Pac brings them down to a catch weight for a reason. To weaken them. THERE IS NO OTHER EXPLAINATION.

    If he believed he could beat a 154 fighter he'd fight them at 154.

    If he thought he could have beat cotto at 147 the fight would have been at 147.

    If he thought he could beat ODH at 154 he would have fought at 154.

    He didn't think he could win any of those fights at those weights. If he did he would have done them with out the catch weight. It's a no fucking brainer no matter how you try and rationalize it.

    And finally mr dildo I take it you want to abolish all weight divisions and do avery fight at whatever the fighters argee.
    I ahve actually covered this step by step in earlier posts. It's not my fault you havn't bothered to read them.

    But the answer is no.

    Oscar held all the negotiating power against Manny. It wasn't a case of Manny dragging Oscar down to 147, it was Oscar dragging a little guy up three weight classes. All of the prefight criticism was levelled at Oscar. Do you disagree with this?

    Margarito was a welterweight. Had they fought at welterweight would you have disapproved? He actually GAINED weight compared to the entire rest of his career. Mosley must have beat a really weight drained Margarito right, seeing as he weighed in 4lbs lighter than he did against Manny...........

    Cotto lost 1lb. A single 1lb. I will say it again, 1 (one) lb.

    Does that cause a man to physically drain. I really think not. I am sure there is a point where a pound can make a huge difference but that was not it for Cotto. He chose to weigh in against Clottey at 146. He voluntarily decided that 146 lbs was his optimum weight.

    Nobody weight ranges from optimum to weight drained in the course of one single pound.

    The difference from weighing 144 to 143 might be significant for Cotto, but not from 146 to 145.

    What part of this do you disagree with?


    Please state which fighters you think lost the fight at the scales and the evidence you use to demonstrate this.......................


    And I completely disagree with you regarding weakening opponents. Manny's maximum weight is 148 lbs. We both acknowledge that he never weighs more than this.

    So if a fighter wants to fight him, he wants them to fight around that weight limit. Margarito at a catchweight meant a weight differential of 148 vs 165, 17lbs. At no catchweight it might have been 148 vs 170. The point is Manny is not getting bigger, only his opponent.

    Why would I want to abolish weight classes? You are the one who seems to insist that the bigger guy must be allowed to weigh as much as he likes. I'm in favour of setting an agree fight limit.
    I'll stick to the key facts which I've already highlighted

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post

    If he believed he could beat a 154 fighter he'd fight them at 154.

    If he thought he could have beat cotto at 147 the fight would have been at 147.

    If he thought he could beat ODH at 154 he would have fought at 154.

    He didn't think he could win any of those fights at those weights. If he did he would have done them with out the catch weight. It's a no fucking brainer no matter how you try and rationalize it.
    Again, Manny didn't beat a 150lb man for the 154 lb title, he beat a 165lb man. If Margarito entered the ring at 154lb he likely would have lost even worse.

    24 hour weigh ins are not boxing tradition, they are modern media demanded invention. They unfairly favour the bigger fighter.

    Also Manny has only insisted on catchweight fights after rising through 10 (TEN!!!!) weight classes.

    If Sergio Martinez fought Jean Pascal at 173lbs you would be outraged?
    If Nonito Donaire fought Juan Guzman at 138lb you would be outraged?
    If Jean Pascal fought David Haye at 215lbs you would be outraged?

    All of these fights sound like massive massive massive risks for the smaller man.

    No other fighter in the history of boxing has done what Manny has done, even allowing for two catchweights. He has done more to raise interest for the sport worldwide than any other currently active fighter.

    You are simply not a fan of boxing if you are not a fan of Manny Pacquaio.
    BIGGEST LOAD OF TOSH I'VE HEARD!!!!!!!!

    No he beat 150 pound man for the 154 title. No fighter in ANY weight division enters the ring at their weigh in weight. That argument is a complete nonsencical joke. I can't believe you've even tried to go that route. Absolute CRAP!

    You can't be a fan of boxing because you are happy for a fighter to try and rewrite the rule book.

    HOW CAN A 154 TITLE BE WON AT 150 POUNDS!? It's absurd. and the fact that that gets a pat on the back from you shows you have nothing but contempt for the integrity of the sport.

    The fact you are happy and in favour of these handicap matches shows you don't give a shit about fairness in sport.

    If I watch a fight I want to see both guys at 100%. Not one get at 100% and another guy at 80% or less.

    Dildo as far as I'm concerned you are a complete joke. You have no passion for the sport. Hang your head in shame for that last post.

    And again back to THE ISSUE OF THE THREAD!

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post

    If he believed he could beat a 154 fighter he'd fight them at 154.

    If he thought he could have beat cotto at 147 the fight would have been at 147.

    If he thought he could beat ODH at 154 he would have fought at 154.

    He didn't think he could win any of those fights at those weights. If he did he would have done them with out the catch weight. It's a no fucking brainer no matter how you try and rationalize it.

    Manny has had 57 fights. Two have been at a catchweight.

    Manny has won world titles from flyweight junior middleweight, a span of 10 weight divisions. In all that time he has had only one catchweight fight at welter, and one at junior middleweight.

    Manny is not a junior middleweight, welterweight or probably even a light welter. At best he's now a natural lightweight, and yet to get better competition he has moved up well, well, well beyond the comfort zone of ANY other fighter in history. No other man who has ever laced up a pair of gloves has risen up through as many weight classes as him.

    In his own natural weight classes, from flyweight to super featherweight, he fought everybody, no catchweight, no 'unfair' advantages or anything.

    How far does a man have to go before he is cut some slack?

    You never answered my questions (as you cannot they simply expose you for what you are) but if ANY other fighter attempted to do what Manny has been doing, the matchups they would have to fight sound ridiculous (or rediculous as you would say).

    Martinez vs Pascal at 173 lbs, Pascal vs Haye at 215lbs, Darchinyan vs J M Marquez at 135lbs. According to your criteria, all of these fights would be unfairly skewed in favour of the smaller man, and that just sums up how utterly utterly cretinous you are.

    It would be huge if any of the smaller fighters took these fights.

    Weight loss doesn't automatically kill a fighter. Glen Johnson moved down, not just a couple pounds but a whole division, well past 40 years old and knocked out Allan Green. Shane Mosley moved down a whole weight class and became a world champ again all over, Bernard Hopkins, now fighting at light heavyweight, got down to 156lbs to knock out Oscar De La Hoya, who clearly wasn't trying to make B Hop lose on the scales

    Have I mentioned you are a cretin?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Buddy McGirt's Fighters ALWAYS lose
    By Lance Uppercut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 12-03-2010, 03:35 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-03-2008, 06:07 PM
  3. PRIDE fighters will lose in UFC for a while....
    By El Gamo in forum Mixed Martial Arts
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-19-2007, 11:41 PM
  4. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 07-03-2007, 01:44 PM
  5. What makes you all think De la Hoya is Fake???
    By TheSilverBoy in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 04-28-2007, 11:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing