Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
Consider this if PAC never fought Hatton when Hatton was the lineal champ at 140 but instead destroys Bradley or Alexander, I'm pretty sure people will say he never beat Hatton and should've fought Hatton instead.
And if PAC instead of fighting Cotto, Marg or Clottey beat Berto first, people will say Berto is UNTESTED.
It'll never satisfy our satiety that's my point.
[SIGPIC]
Hidden Content
Array
Fans like me dont consider Manny as the GOAT, we just think that whatever he does is not enough for others that's all.
[SIGPIC]
Hidden Content
Array
Sure this is a bad fight considering Mosley's career at this point.
But I would like to point out to the revisionist historians out there. Pacquiao didn't force De La Hoya to fight at 147 for a big payday. That's just bullshit. There's a reason why DLH is nicknamed the Goldenboy. No fighter in history has ever had the upperhand in negotiations when negotiating with the Goldenboy. Not Chavez, Whitaker, Tinidad, Vargas, Hopkins, Floyd or Manny. So let's cut that bullshit out.
And another thing Tim Bradley is fighting Alexander at the end of next month, and you have the same people saying he should have fought Bradley, when they didn't bother to check whether or not Bradley is busy with a upcoming fight. But 5 months from now the same people will say Pacquiao ducked Bradley after he fought Margarito.
Array
Completely. But please realise that most of us believe that Manny is the real deal. He is absolutely tremendous, one of the greatest fighters of all time. However, because of this, while he only has a few fights left in his career, surely you want to see your man tested to the limit. Surely you must understand, that a 40 year old Mosley, who couldn't handle Mayweather's speed, has little chance of challenging Manny. It is not a criticism of Pacquiao's achievements, it is merely a request for a better choice of opponent.
Array
[SIGPIC]
Hidden Content
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks