Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Should they have taken Bin Laden alive?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 158

Thread: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    9,172
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1870
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    THAT would incite attacks and kidnappings etc with the crazy muslims wanting to free their zealot leader.
    very true. Could have been like Airforce One, Die Hard II , Toy Soldiers etc..


    this outcome was for the best - though a short period in captivity and torture would have been better
    Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North of South
    Posts
    2,693
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1056
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    In answer to the question: Yes.

    Considering what happened to Saddam Hussien, I would of thought the same would have been done to OBL.

    To show the world he had been captured and paraded on global television, then tried in court for his criminal activities would have been better imo.

    Maybe the is some truth in what Bilbo is saying, who knows? and I guess we wont till the US divulges all the info regards to shooting.

    Capture him, parade the capture, try him, then a public execution would have been the way I would have done it.
    Hidden Content SADDO'S FIGHT NIGHT RD4 CHAMPION, TAKING ON ALL COMERS ! Hidden Content

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,880
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1529
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    I think in the morden world the law does not always seem to equel justice.

    Bin Laden deserved to die in a horrible way and thats what he got IMO.It was justice

    Also what benifit would it serve to keep him alive.All it would do is fan more extreamists when he would spout his hatred at his trail.

    The SEAL team were give the nod and wink the same way the British SAS were when dealing with the IRA.Bring him in dead.

    Job well done!
    Balls

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3373
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    Quote Originally Posted by porkypara View Post
    I think in the morden world the law does not always seem to equel justice.

    Bin Laden deserved to die in a horrible way and thats what he got IMO.It was justice

    Also what benifit would it serve to keep him alive.All it would do is fan more extreamists when he would spout his hatred at his trail.

    The SEAL team were give the nod and wink the same way the British SAS were when dealing with the IRA.Bring him in dead.

    Job well done!
    Miles has a point though about Assange. Had the US dropped a killing squad into the mansion he was staying in and slaughtered a bunch of people there would have been an outcry.

    Had the Pakistani's launched an attack on some enemy of their state on American soil they would now be facing two weeks of carpet bombing.

    Also it makes the British look stupid. America send in their navy seals and kick ass, we sent our SAS into LIbya to help the rebels and they captured us and sent us packing tail between legs.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,880
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1529
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by porkypara View Post
    I think in the morden world the law does not always seem to equel justice.

    Bin Laden deserved to die in a horrible way and thats what he got IMO.It was justice

    Also what benifit would it serve to keep him alive.All it would do is fan more extreamists when he would spout his hatred at his trail.

    The SEAL team were give the nod and wink the same way the British SAS were when dealing with the IRA.Bring him in dead.

    Job well done!
    Miles has a point though about Assange. Had the US dropped a killing squad into the mansion he was staying in and slaughtered a bunch of people there would have been an outcry.

    Had the Pakistani's launched an attack on some enemy of their state on American soil they would now be facing two weeks of carpet bombing.

    Also it makes the British look stupid. America send in their navy seals and kick ass, we sent our SAS into LIbya to help the rebels and they captured us and sent us packing tail between legs.
    The seal mission and the sas in Libya are two totaly different cases and they cant really be compaired.

    If Pakistan had been willing or able to do the job they would have been left to do it.But unfortunaly Pakistan could not be trusted and the US had to do the job.
    Balls

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,785
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2170
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    Another good question in addition to the thread title is :

    "Should a photo be released to prove Bin Laden is dead?"

    The fact it's been stated he was behind the worst terrorism attack on American soil ever,,, on the World's most wanted list for the better part of the last 10 years,,, had probably 100's of millions of dollars of American taxpayer money spent on finding him and his posse,,, the fact it actually TOOK America 10 years to find him,,, I think it needs to be released...

    I don't really buy into any of the reasons given of why they can't provide evidence other than their word...

    Assange has some work to do!
    Last edited by Dizaster; 05-05-2011 at 01:31 PM.
    ~ He thinks he's a Tornado,,,... F'ckn real Tornado is comin'...! ~Hidden Content

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,880
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1529
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dizaster View Post
    Another good question in addition to the thread title is :

    "Should a photo be released to prove Bin Laden is dead?"

    The fact it's been stated he was behind the worst terrorism attack on American soil ever,,, on the World's most wanted list for the better part of the last 10 years,,, had probably 100's of millions of dollars of American taxpayer money spent on finding him and his posse,,, the fact it actually TOOK America 10 years to find him,,, I think it needs to be released...

    I don't really buy into any of the reasons given of why they can't provide evidence other than their word...
    I think Bush should take some of the blame as to why its taken so long as he started the pointless war in Iraq which made the world a more dangerouse place and made millions of new enemys for the west.Also it diverted much needed resourses from the hunt for Bin Laden.
    Balls

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,963
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    You can't take alive a guy that's been dead for ten years.

    or one that never existed in the first place.


    And even if he did exist and was stil alive, taking him alive and bringing him to justice in a fair court of law is just not the american way.

    The other problem with taking him alive is you'd have to charge him for 9/11. Now the problem with that is the FBI never held him responsible for 9/11 in the first place.

    FBI — Ten Most Wanted And his name is spelt differently....


    People would find that a bit odd, and then if you did decide to try him for 9/11 you'd have to come up with some kind of evidence not to mention that bin laden may have started talking and showing up more inconsistancies in the official story.

    Nope it's better to kill off the boogie man in a blaze of Hollywood movie style bravado, that the american people lap up like a thirsty dog on a hot day.

    Just when Obama's approval rating is at the lowest of any american president at this point in a term, just when Obama needs to show he's a leader, just as he's about to start a re election campeign. and now he's off to ground zero to grand stand and no doubt give an emotional and rousing speech about 'getting the job done' or some other 'mission accomplished' style propaganda bullshit.


    The whole thing is so absurdly comical to me, that people actually believe and buy into this crap.


    My final thoughts.....

    If the US went into afghanistan to get bin laden how come they are still there now that the guy is dead?

    Doesn't the fact that they 'found' him in Pakistan make the last 10 years of blood shed pointless? (setting aside the real agenda which was to secure oil, opium and lithium) Surely anyone with half a brain should be asking what the real agenda is.

    One of the most technologically advanced milliataries with one of the biggest budgets in the world took ten years to find one guy living in a mansion in Pakistan? But hold on they didn't, it was his next door neigbours twitter feed that gave the game away. That doesn't sound the remotest bit ludicris to any of you?

    After killing bin laden the corpse is thrown in the sea and the pictures are too disgusting? Just take our word for it we got him? Really?

    The media and government have got it so easy. They don't even need to try anymore. People will believe ANYTHING!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2082
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Now the problem with that is the FBI never held him responsible for 9/11 in the first place.

    FBI — Ten Most Wanted And his name is spelt differently....

    Jesus Christ...



    You do know that the name isn't actually spelt using the English alphabet... it's Arabic and there is no official English translation... a lot of people say Osama and a lot of people INCLUDING THE FBI and CIA say Usama

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,963
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Now the problem with that is the FBI never held him responsible for 9/11 in the first place.

    FBI — Ten Most Wanted And his name is spelt differently....

    Jesus Christ...



    You do know that the name isn't actually spelt using the English alphabet... it's Arabic and there is no official English translation... a lot of people say Osama and a lot of people INCLUDING THE FBI and CIA say Usama

    Out of all the things mentioned in my post you pick up a descrepency on spelling

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    a local pub near you.
    Posts
    7,652
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2843
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Now the problem with that is the FBI never held him responsible for 9/11 in the first place.

    FBI — Ten Most Wanted And his name is spelt differently....

    Jesus Christ...



    You do know that the name isn't actually spelt using the English alphabet... it's Arabic and there is no official English translation... a lot of people say Osama and a lot of people INCLUDING THE FBI and CIA say Usama

    Out of all the things mentioned in my post you pick up a descrepency on spelling
    Because it was completely calling bullshit on the point!
    "If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2082
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornfinger View Post
    Now the problem with that is the FBI never held him responsible for 9/11 in the first place.

    FBI — Ten Most Wanted And his name is spelt differently....

    Jesus Christ...



    You do know that the name isn't actually spelt using the English alphabet... it's Arabic and there is no official English translation... a lot of people say Osama and a lot of people INCLUDING THE FBI and CIA say Usama

    Out of all the things mentioned in my post you pick up a descrepency on spelling
    Because you were saying that the FBI website has spelt it differently as if it was somehow relevant to some conspiracy... when in actual fact it just highlighted your lack of knowledge regarding what you were trying to speak with authority about?

    Honestly, I could try and go into your other points... but I doubt we'd get very far. You should be thankful that I've just educated you and now you know that not everybody uses the English Alphabet and how this may affect translations etc.


  13. #13
    El Kabong Guest

    Default

    "The problem with Arabic is that its difficult to read" - OSS 117

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2082
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    أسامة بن محمد بن عوض بن لادن‎

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    437
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    958
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?

    When anyone starts to say he was unarmed and it was wrong I think about the innocents in the Twin Towers and on the tubes/bus in London - they were unarmed too.

    You go around blowing people up then don't expect when justice comes calling that it's coming with a cup of tea and a blanket. If there was intel to be gained then yes he should have been taken alive if not then to me a double tap to the head was quicker and more humane than he deserved - period.
    'To speak with his equal and irish man is forced to talk with God...'

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Sorry not boxing but Bin Laden is dead.
    By IamInuit in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 91
    Last Post: 05-08-2011, 12:50 AM
  2. Sorry not boxing but Bin Laden is dead.
    By IamInuit in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 05-02-2011, 08:28 PM
  3. Hearing reports Bin Laden is dead
    By IamInuit in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-02-2011, 05:08 AM
  4. Coded message from Bin Laden
    By Mark TKO in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-24-2007, 08:39 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing