Pacman vs JMM 11/5 2011 at.........145

[KKisser]

145? If true then I am very upset. The ball is totally in Manny's favour and there is no hint of compromise as that is weight he weighs in at anyway. I am appalled actually.

No it's 144. He's sacrificing 1 pound from his last fight just like Cotto sacrificed 1 pound from his last fight. Let's say if JMM pulls off the upset, would you give JMM credit or would you discredit that win? Just asking out of curiosity.

Haha, 1 pound!

I would be totally amazed if he were to win.

Many of us thought Oscar would beat Pac because he was just too big. But Oscar actually went down an entire division to make the fight happen and Pac as brave as he was accepted the challenge and went up two.

Here the big difference is that Manny has grown into the weight, but is only willing to sacrifice a few hundred grammes. Marquez meanwhile is manfully upping two entire divisions.

So in terms of credit I would firstly like to say that Manny has diminished any credit if he gets the win by being such a fascist. Oscar was a complete gentleman in coming down, but Pac has obviously allowed his politics to influence his boxing and he now likes to dictate. If Marquez can somehow overcome this massive weight hurdle then he deserves full credit because he jumped through all the hoops to get to his prize.

144 is horrible really.

First off, Oscar didn't move down 1 entire division. He came down from 3 pounds from the Forbes fight which ironically was at a catchweight of 150, while he made a guy that had basically fought his entire career below 130 to jump up another 2 weight classes after moving up from 1 already to fight him. Yeah that's definitely gentlemanly of Oscar.

I just find it funny that people say pacquiao does not deserve any credit for beating Cotto even though Cotto came in 1 pound less than his previous fight. Whereas JMM negotiated Pac to come in 1 pound lighter than his previous fight and if he does beat Pac, he deserves all the credit?

Like I said, let's have some consistency shall we?

Oscar did move down a division. 150 is within the JMW limits and WW is the next step down. Sure, the Forbes fight 3 pounds above that, but Oscar had been at JMW for many years prior and coming back down to WW proper was clearly a BIG sacrifice. He made that compromise and got his Manny fight. Manny compromised by jumping a long way too.

The Oscar fight proved that Manny could fight at the 147 limit and that is why critics say that he should have done the same to face Cotto.

I have already explained why Manny loses the chance to gain massive credit if he beats Marquez at 144. He has made no sacrifice to give the fans a more equal playing field. Even Oscar, who we all criticised gave up something, but Manny gives up nothing. Meanwhile Marquez is being asked to jump all the hurdles.

Of course Marquez deserves the credit if he wins and of course Manny should be criticised right now for making the fight at a 144 CW. You don't expect a smaller guy to jump all the hurdles while you jump through none. That isn't credit worthy. Marquez has NO track record at WW. Manny prior to Cotto did, whence criticism of the CW.

The argument is pretty consistent.

marquez sure as hell didn't get criticized when he fought the weight drained pacquiao at 126 and 130lbs now why should manny be criticized now for fighting at his best weight? marquez is the one pursuing the fight anyway so why would you censure it if they both agreed to 144lbs and marquez seem to be satisfied with it? anyway at fight night there wouldn't be much of a difference between their weights.

Those were Pac's weights at the time just as they were those of Marquez. Pac is now a WW and Marquez still a LW.

Nobody in their right mind would have been against a 140 compromise. There is nothing biased in that view. One goes up and one goes down and the grudge match is set up. What we now have is a fighter used to the weigh in weight and guys of this size and another who quite simply isn't.

Pac holds all the cards.

not if they're fighting for pacs wbo welterweight belt. then i think there shouldn't even be a catchweight.

A Pac fan against a catch weight? I guess it's just when it's for Pac's belt. I hate catch weights too, but not only when "fighting for pacs wbo welterweight belt"

where does it say that if you're a pac fan you're automatically stupid? i've always been consistent with the catchweight thing for a title belt. you can search my views on the pac-cotto catchweight fight. but i guess now that the shoe is on the other foot noone is making an issue out of it.